b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » Message 10847709 (Thread)

# I'm a little surprised that you're surprised that someone has taken pictures of a celebrity with their bewbs out?
lolshockz
(I helped save b3ta! addickted has attained freedom, Fri 14 Sep 2012, 11:16, archived)
# This
If it was just a previous Big Brother contestant who'd been photographed topless, would anyone, except the morons who read Closer anyway, give a toss?
(I helped save b3ta! Butters and his titanium codsocket, Fri 14 Sep 2012, 11:25, archived)
# if we're talking about a Big Brother contestant, then knocking bet is that they'll have arranged the photos anyway
(likeajackhammer, Fri 14 Sep 2012, 11:28, archived)
# Let's face it. The kind of people who are interested in this kind of thing
are claiming benefits, enjoy Eastenders and have the mental intelligence of a fig.
(I helped save b3ta! addickted has attained freedom, Fri 14 Sep 2012, 11:28, archived)
# this is a large portion of what bothers me...
in the fact that there's a market for photos of famous people doing really mundane things.

The right hand column of the daily mail website for a start
(likeajackhammer, Fri 14 Sep 2012, 11:34, archived)
# It's the society we live in sadly. Cunty people want other cunty people to snap familiar looking cunty people to feed their inordinately sad cunty lives.
(I helped save b3ta! addickted has attained freedom, Fri 14 Sep 2012, 11:37, archived)
# And if people weren't able to live vicariously through people they've seen on the TV
They'd have nothing to distract them from how sad and cunty their lives are, which will only make them sadder and cuntier.

They're already sad and cunty enough as it is. Don't make things worse!
(I helped save b3ta! Butters and his titanium codsocket, Fri 14 Sep 2012, 11:43, archived)
# Ooo. You mentioned the word Vicarious...
I'm off to listen to Tool.
(I helped save b3ta! addickted has attained freedom, Fri 14 Sep 2012, 11:46, archived)
# Word.
(I helped save b3ta! atomic A-bomb-a-nation, Fri 14 Sep 2012, 14:25, archived)
# who said I was surprised?
(likeajackhammer, Fri 14 Sep 2012, 11:27, archived)
# Ok, maybe not surprise but the fact that you are annoyed that a pap has photographed a naked 'sleb.
(I helped save b3ta! addickted has attained freedom, Fri 14 Sep 2012, 11:34, archived)
# I'm not annoyed at the photo (although as I say above, the fact there's a market for this shite bothers me)
I just think it shouldn't be dismissed on the grounds that the photos aren't very good.
(likeajackhammer, Fri 14 Sep 2012, 11:36, archived)
# equally, it shouldn't be dismissed on the grounds that they have a fuckton of money
(likeajackhammer, Fri 14 Sep 2012, 11:37, archived)
# Given all the attention that was paid to her sisters arse when Will and Kate got married,
it's a bit duplicitous of the papers to get all steamed about this. If they were being consistent they'd be going on about how good/bad they are, not the fact a picture has been taken of them.
(I helped save b3ta! Smallbrainfield, Fri 14 Sep 2012, 11:43, archived)
# hahahaha
tomorrows Sun front page
EXCLUSIVE, KATE'S TITS, OUR OFFICIAL JUDGEMENT
(I helped save b3ta! HappyToast Groat froth, Fri 14 Sep 2012, 11:52, archived)
# The Mirror would be asking if we were getting value for money
out of Kate's tits. As taxpayers we have a right to see them.
(I helped save b3ta! Smallbrainfield, Fri 14 Sep 2012, 12:01, archived)
# ^
(I helped save b3ta! emvee cruor deo cruoris, Fri 14 Sep 2012, 12:35, archived)