
Oooh. Satire. Perhaps we should organize a leaving pressie for him?
( ,
Mon 12 Nov 2012, 10:36,
archived)

and they would be able to terminate his employment at any time.
( ,
Mon 12 Nov 2012, 10:46,
archived)

[edit] also they were saying on the news earlier that contractually the beeb only has to give him a 6 month pay off, it is the trust that has decided to up it to 12 months.
( ,
Mon 12 Nov 2012, 11:36,
archived)

But what the hell about ITV? The Newsnight thing didn't mention McAlpine by name; Philip Schofield had a list of names live on air!
( ,
Mon 12 Nov 2012, 11:02,
archived)

I'm sick of all the politicos and interested parties, who keep stcking a knife ino the BBC at every chance they get.
The BBC is not perfect but it's lightyears better than a paid for by advertisers services everywhere else.
( ,
Mon 12 Nov 2012, 11:14,
archived)
The BBC is not perfect but it's lightyears better than a paid for by advertisers services everywhere else.

Suggests to me Murdoch's still in charge of the debate.
ITV deserve some abuse for Schofield's stupid stunt. And if not that, for being shit and moronic at all times.
Leave Auntie Alone!
( ,
Mon 12 Nov 2012, 11:20,
archived)
ITV deserve some abuse for Schofield's stupid stunt. And if not that, for being shit and moronic at all times.
Leave Auntie Alone!

Although the Beeb does seem to make things worse for itself by making itself the top story.
( ,
Mon 12 Nov 2012, 12:05,
archived)


Invariably by organisations/individuals that have scores to settle and their own skeletons to hide.
Happy B3taday, also.
( ,
Mon 12 Nov 2012, 11:25,
archived)
Happy B3taday, also.

I meant to get my shizzle together and post a pic in celebration but alas my shizzle remains scattered.
( ,
Mon 12 Nov 2012, 11:47,
archived)

He was unlucky enough to get the job at a really bad time and was effectively made redundant, taking one for the team.
As such he would be entitled to one month pay per year worked, probably works out a lot more than he got.
I've got more time for him than the smug git he replaced.
( ,
Mon 12 Nov 2012, 11:11,
archived)
As such he would be entitled to one month pay per year worked, probably works out a lot more than he got.
I've got more time for him than the smug git he replaced.