b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 10971297 (Thread)

# there are too many, they need killing, you cant have ten badgers in ever squre mile, the things are cunts
(, Sat 8 Jun 2013, 22:44, archived)
# I've never actually seen a badger.
I don't think they exist.
(, Sat 8 Jun 2013, 22:47, archived)
# loads of the cunts it seems, i live in town, foxes are bad enough
(, Sat 8 Jun 2013, 22:55, archived)
# ship them to the inner-cities here in the USA :D
(, Sat 8 Jun 2013, 23:01, archived)
# i reckon a few fighting as a team could fuck up a pitbull
(, Sat 8 Jun 2013, 23:04, archived)
# you can have our inner city urban foxes too, mange ridden kentucky eating ginger fuckers
(, Sat 8 Jun 2013, 23:05, archived)
# aw, I'm sure Rob's not that bad
(, Sun 9 Jun 2013, 0:25, archived)
# rob fingers kids
(, Sun 9 Jun 2013, 0:48, archived)
# we all know this and we have to keep it covered up
(, Sun 9 Jun 2013, 1:13, archived)
# You're quite right, you can't have ten badgers in every square km
(not mile - based on that document)
Frankly, the notion is ludicrous. That's ten times the estimate of the fox population in the UK. If they're coming up with numbers like that, there *has* to be something wrong with their data collection method. I'm no expert on the ecology of badgers, but that figure just sounds fishy as fuck to me.
(, Sun 9 Jun 2013, 0:09, archived)
# Following up
The Badger Trust's website has an estimate from 2005 of 288,000 badgers in the UK, which would be around 1 per sq km, roughly the same as foxes. That sounds a *lot* more likely to me. So either their estimation method is way off or they chose some areas to sample with particularly high population density. Either way, that's a huge discrepancy and if they're planning to slaughter 70% of badgers, it's hard to see how they can do that with any degree of accuracy based on those numbers.
(, Sun 9 Jun 2013, 0:22, archived)
# it's like badgers live in badger habitat, and loads live together and cause a problem because they are cunts
(, Sun 9 Jun 2013, 0:45, archived)
# 'blinded by technical terminology'
(, Sun 9 Jun 2013, 1:19, archived)
# So your saying that Defra and various scientific bodies have overestimated the badger population by 10 times, and only you've noticed?
Or could it be you don't undertsand what your talking about, and using a combination of ignorance and confirmation biased, are spouting any old shit to support your beliefs?
(, Sun 9 Jun 2013, 8:14, archived)
# it could be just words on the internet, of course
(, Sun 9 Jun 2013, 10:17, archived)
# badgers are ghetto cunts, why they get so much tb, skanks
(, Sun 9 Jun 2013, 0:22, archived)
# From the major independent government-sponsored study:
Given its high costs and low benefits we therefore conclude that badger culling is unlikely to contribute usefully to the control of cattle TB in Britain, and recommend that TB control efforts focus on measures other than badger culling

In this case it's the farmers that are consistently being cunts. Badgers are just getting on with being badgers.
(, Sun 9 Jun 2013, 0:33, archived)
# if you love badger land so much why dont you go and live there>
then we can cull you as well
(, Sun 9 Jun 2013, 0:44, archived)
# Dear Mr Mongy of Chops.
You have made your views on Badgers patently clear.

Out of interest, what are your views on 15 year old dancing hamsters?

Kind Regards,

Redsushi
(, Sun 9 Jun 2013, 1:39, archived)
# i fucking love em
(, Sun 9 Jun 2013, 1:43, archived)