
( ,
Sat 8 Jun 2013, 22:44,
archived)

( , Sat 8 Jun 2013, 22:55, archived)

( ,
Sat 8 Jun 2013, 23:05,
archived)

(not mile - based on that document)
Frankly, the notion is ludicrous. That's ten times the estimate of the fox population in the UK. If they're coming up with numbers like that, there *has* to be something wrong with their data collection method. I'm no expert on the ecology of badgers, but that figure just sounds fishy as fuck to me.
( ,
Sun 9 Jun 2013, 0:09,
archived)
Frankly, the notion is ludicrous. That's ten times the estimate of the fox population in the UK. If they're coming up with numbers like that, there *has* to be something wrong with their data collection method. I'm no expert on the ecology of badgers, but that figure just sounds fishy as fuck to me.

The Badger Trust's website has an estimate from 2005 of 288,000 badgers in the UK, which would be around 1 per sq km, roughly the same as foxes. That sounds a *lot* more likely to me. So either their estimation method is way off or they chose some areas to sample with particularly high population density. Either way, that's a huge discrepancy and if they're planning to slaughter 70% of badgers, it's hard to see how they can do that with any degree of accuracy based on those numbers.
( ,
Sun 9 Jun 2013, 0:22,
archived)

( ,
Sun 9 Jun 2013, 0:45,
archived)

Or could it be you don't undertsand what your talking about, and using a combination of ignorance and confirmation biased, are spouting any old shit to support your beliefs?
( ,
Sun 9 Jun 2013, 8:14,
archived)

Given its high costs and low benefits we therefore conclude that badger culling is unlikely to contribute usefully to the control of cattle TB in Britain, and recommend that TB control efforts focus on measures other than badger culling
In this case it's the farmers that are consistently being cunts. Badgers are just getting on with being badgers.
( ,
Sun 9 Jun 2013, 0:33,
archived)
In this case it's the farmers that are consistently being cunts. Badgers are just getting on with being badgers.

then we can cull you as well
( ,
Sun 9 Jun 2013, 0:44,
archived)

You have made your views on Badgers patently clear.
Out of interest, what are your views on 15 year old dancing hamsters?
Kind Regards,
Redsushi
( ,
Sun 9 Jun 2013, 1:39,
archived)
Out of interest, what are your views on 15 year old dancing hamsters?
Kind Regards,
Redsushi

So on that basis, probably ducks.
( ,
Sun 9 Jun 2013, 0:23,
archived)

( ,
Sun 9 Jun 2013, 0:46,
archived)


...Than all the badgers combined.
( ,
Sun 9 Jun 2013, 9:12,
archived)

and that's just plain wrong
( ,
Sun 9 Jun 2013, 10:13,
archived)

since most of the top predators have been made extinct, so the current ecosystem needs a lot of management
( ,
Sun 9 Jun 2013, 13:24,
archived)

But then farmers can't can't get the government to pay for that, can they? Odd how the Department for the Elimination of Furry and Rare Animals swing from trying to completely fuck farmers one minute and then swing violently the other way on a whim.
( ,
Sun 9 Jun 2013, 8:30,
archived)

so they're fucked
mind you the farmers round here (rural Cornwall) are all cunts
( ,
Sun 9 Jun 2013, 10:15,
archived)
mind you the farmers round here (rural Cornwall) are all cunts