In my humble opinioni like the detail of the first and the background of the second. that would work well.
(
Ya What Skiddlyboop,
Mon 19 Aug 2013, 15:08,
archived)
well yeah,but the background lets it down. I'm sure that wasn't the point, but the second one has surrounding detail which adds the overall effect. but if i had to pick one, it'd be the first. Can I have another go and try and be even more long winded? I only ask because i'm quite bored at the moment and have nothing much to do...
( Ya What Skiddlyboop,
Mon 19 Aug 2013, 15:14,
archived)
You're right, the background has more detailThe idea would be to go back and add that to the first sketch style if I settle on that technique.
(
gingerbenji wrote a book http://goo.gl/8UiGjd,
Mon 19 Aug 2013, 15:29,
archived)
But the background of both pictures is just flat orange with an orange splotch.
(,
Mon 19 Aug 2013, 15:32,
archived)
I interpreted his meaning as the shading on the dinosaurThe background itself is indeed identical
( gingerbenji wrote a book http://goo.gl/8UiGjd,
Mon 19 Aug 2013, 15:42,
archived)
sorry, i confused matters somewhatyeah, I meant the 'colouring in bit', the content within the outlines.
this is what happens when I get bored, I make-a-no-sense...
the sketchier one, the first one. it has more movement.
(this is what happens when I get bored, I make-a-no-sense...
the sketchier one, the first one. it has more movement.
Ya What Skiddlyboop,
Mon 19 Aug 2013, 15:46,
archived)
WhewI was afraid I was ruining a very subtle joke.
YES THE DETAIL ON THE SECOND ORANGE SPLOTCH IS TRULY EXQUISITE
(,
Mon 19 Aug 2013, 15:51,
archived)
YES THE DETAIL ON THE SECOND ORANGE SPLOTCH IS TRULY EXQUISITE
hmmm...now you mention it... that detail is very... splotchy...
( Ya What Skiddlyboop,
Mon 19 Aug 2013, 16:07,
archived)
With regard to the issue of content, the optical suggestions of the spatial relationships brings within the realm of discourse the eloquence of these pieces.(
Elvis impersonator,
Mon 19 Aug 2013, 15:31,
archived)
