
but this is the 3rd or 4th time I've posted this is (and still looks like) just a high street swimwear advert, not porn
( ,
Wed 28 Aug 2013, 22:12,
archived)

"A suggestive picture of a lady in her underwear is probably NSFW even though there is no nudity"
( ,
Wed 28 Aug 2013, 22:15,
archived)

personally a large porcelain doll face is far from sexual if glanced at across an office, but horses for courses eh.
( ,
Wed 28 Aug 2013, 22:21,
archived)

phwooar, i say
( ,
Wed 28 Aug 2013, 22:32,
archived)

I nearly got sacked. Apparently "masturbation" is against company policy
( ,
Wed 28 Aug 2013, 22:37,
archived)

a tug at work is a human right
( ,
Wed 28 Aug 2013, 22:42,
archived)

i'm less sure if you're meaning two teams squaring off on either end of a rope - have a chat with your union rep. you can call him rudy.
( ,
Wed 28 Aug 2013, 23:04,
archived)

If you find that picture suggestive of sexual activity then, well, yeah.
( ,
Wed 28 Aug 2013, 22:26,
archived)

or something...
O_o?
( ,
Wed 28 Aug 2013, 22:28,
archived)
O_o?

fanny.
and HT you're a bigger one for linking it and not telling him to fuck off. :)
( ,
Thu 29 Aug 2013, 0:22,
archived)
and HT you're a bigger one for linking it and not telling him to fuck off. :)

But aren't the FAQs there so new people can learn 'the rules', and if they are not correct as interpreted by a 'new person', then aren't they somewhat pointless?
In any case I appear to have interpreted the rules correctly, as HP has just linked the image.
What else can I assist you with? Thanks for the warm welcome though, although that's a 'her', not a 'him'.
( ,
Thu 29 Aug 2013, 6:24,
archived)
In any case I appear to have interpreted the rules correctly, as HP has just linked the image.
What else can I assist you with? Thanks for the warm welcome though, although that's a 'her', not a 'him'.