no excuses.
From the A New Stunt for David Blaine challenge. See all 164 entries (closed)
( , Mon 27 May 2002, 16:20, archived)
From the A New Stunt for David Blaine challenge. See all 164 entries (closed)
( , Mon 27 May 2002, 16:20, archived)
and, apparently, no reaction.
oh well. it amused me and that's like 95% of it.
( ,
Mon 27 May 2002, 16:29,
archived)
i liked it..
but am working on me own..
so didnt post till now.
all the other b3tans are meanspirited bastards not to comment :)
( ,
Mon 27 May 2002, 16:32,
archived)
so didnt post till now.
all the other b3tans are meanspirited bastards not to comment :)
bravo
I want to meet the guy who came up with those things. Fantastic amusement.
( ,
Mon 27 May 2002, 16:37,
archived)
It's all about visual timing.
and I don't think I wrote the caption quite right. it takes a second to figure out.
any suggestions on how to change it?
( ,
Mon 27 May 2002, 16:35,
archived)
any suggestions on how to change it?
well QUICK!
tell me how to make it funnier! I think maybe all the punctuation is confusing.
maybe if I did it in 3 lines. maybe if I changed the wording. hmm.
( ,
Mon 27 May 2002, 16:41,
archived)
maybe if I did it in 3 lines. maybe if I changed the wording. hmm.
I'd drop the 'SIR' joke
and just have 'Very funny, Mr Copperfield, now change me back... David... David?'
(The problem is they share a first name so it isn't obvious who is speaking at first)
( ,
Mon 27 May 2002, 16:51,
archived)
(The problem is they share a first name so it isn't obvious who is speaking at first)