aha! Garius?
hats off to Darius, at least he's doing his own songs, not endless, sub-standard cover versions
( ,
Mon 22 Jul 2002, 13:27,
archived)
I agree,
I'd rather that than the usual 'lets release a cover version' pop pappery.
( ,
Mon 22 Jul 2002, 13:31,
archived)
and the record lables wonder why nobody buys records these days
they don't seem to understand WE DON'T WANT TO PAY MONEY FOR AN EVER SO SLIGHTLY DIFFERENT VERSION OF A TWENTY YEAR OLD SONG FOR THE 45TH TIME.
/record industry rant
( ,
Mon 22 Jul 2002, 13:49,
archived)
/record industry rant
The thing is
its aimed at the kiddies who have never heard it before.
( ,
Mon 22 Jul 2002, 13:51,
archived)
shirley there's a bigger market
of people who have heard it 7000 times before and would rather buy something original, and the inexperienced kiddies would buy it too.
( ,
Mon 22 Jul 2002, 14:00,
archived)
I agree,
but that means they record idustry people would have to put some work into researching the market and wotnot.
They know they can sell stuff to the Pre Teen's so thats all they aim it at.
saying that, there is a load of good, original music out there at the moment.
( ,
Mon 22 Jul 2002, 14:03,
archived)
They know they can sell stuff to the Pre Teen's so thats all they aim it at.
saying that, there is a load of good, original music out there at the moment.
i reckon when bruno does the top 40
all cover versions should be labled 'time spazzes' and 'reposts'. that'd soon put a stop to the sick trade.
( ,
Mon 22 Jul 2002, 14:08,
archived)