Since when did we reintroduce the idea of threadwastes?I thought we'd got over them long ago.
(
Sexy Picard 2000,
Sun 9 Nov 2003, 22:28,
archived)
I've always been irked by themAnyway, I'm off for a bath to see if I can calm my raging itchiness down.
( HP hasn't been here in aaaaaages,
Sun 9 Nov 2003, 22:30,
archived)
You know,when you change your name back, that's going to look very odd to people who spazz...
( The Duke Of Your Fingers feels like an old man... mmm, tasty!,
Sun 9 Nov 2003, 22:33,
archived)
when the "masters of the board"reduced the number of threads to a page from 20 to 15 to make b3ta work better
( Bitchpapa,
Sun 9 Nov 2003, 22:31,
archived)
its not too bad nowbut weekday daytime the board moves so fast, TW's just cause things to drop off stupidly fast otherwise.
( discostu oh my, its back,
Sun 9 Nov 2003, 22:31,
archived)
I understand this.I just don't think people should be yelled at for them. Pep has often stated that threadwastes don't exist, and the FAQ says nothing about them. Poor newbies are just trying to fit in half the time.
( Sexy Picard 2000,
Sun 9 Nov 2003, 22:33,
archived)
I don't mind threadwastes eitherpeople should just try and make the most out of the thread by posting old pictures they've made or something.
( mnb098mnb used to be here,
Sun 9 Nov 2003, 22:39,
archived)
there's nothing wrong with a text-only threadbut there's always cunts/new people/the mentally challenged about.
( Reverend Dan,
Sun 9 Nov 2003, 22:33,
archived)
hehenicely described
(
Wildheart Baby. Drunken Mess In A Good Way,
Sun 9 Nov 2003, 22:46,
archived)
I don't think we ever got over thebig board thread reduction bandwidth crisis.
( Lethe is carrying a spade. SPANG.,
Sun 9 Nov 2003, 22:35,
archived)