b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 2300371 (Thread)

# Ack
You guys are too quick! I can't get even one good pic in and there are tons up... jeebus :)
(, Sun 9 Nov 2003, 22:25, archived)
# yup
it's a messageboard-come-chatroom.
(, Sun 9 Nov 2003, 22:26, archived)
# come citizens advice centre
(, Sun 9 Nov 2003, 22:28, archived)
# come
on eileen
(, Sun 9 Nov 2003, 22:34, archived)
# well i swear
(, Sun 9 Nov 2003, 22:35, archived)
# emphasis on the come

tee-hee
(, Sun 9 Nov 2003, 22:28, archived)
# Are
you pished tonight?
(, Sun 9 Nov 2003, 22:29, archived)
# I'm eating beans
and jacket tattie
(, Sun 9 Nov 2003, 22:30, archived)
# i have just seen Matrix Three
And i thought it was good

*runs off before the flameing starts*

:-)
(, Sun 9 Nov 2003, 22:31, archived)
# I've yet to see
but I'll likely enjoy it
(, Sun 9 Nov 2003, 22:32, archived)
# Did you know you look exactly
like Harry Nilsson

I caaaaaant liiiiive, if living is without yooooooo
(, Sun 9 Nov 2003, 22:36, archived)
# that just made me piss myself
laughing
(, Sun 9 Nov 2003, 22:38, archived)
# I do
and you can't
(, Sun 9 Nov 2003, 22:38, archived)
# i agree
far better than the second one
not quite as impacting as the first, thought i was suprised when thingy got thingied!
(, Sun 9 Nov 2003, 22:33, archived)
# Yup
and where i was sitting the speakers made the floor shake at the "good bits"

And i got a REALY good look at the frenchbloakes misssus Norks!
(, Sun 9 Nov 2003, 22:33, archived)
# we have the metro
under the cinema for that ;)
(, Sun 9 Nov 2003, 22:34, archived)
# eh?
For looking at Norks?
(, Sun 9 Nov 2003, 22:35, archived)
# that was
an edit, you crafty devil
(, Sun 9 Nov 2003, 22:36, archived)
# heheh
you said "crafty"
(, Sun 9 Nov 2003, 22:37, archived)
# see i thought the second was much better than this one
they skimped on the action, and the ending (although it couldn't have ended any other way) was a bit cheesy, and it was lighter on the philosophical stuff.
although it did have me on the edge of my seat a few times
(, Sun 9 Nov 2003, 22:34, archived)
# yeah, i liked th action in the second one alot more
but i enjoyed the third one overall, where as the second one was a bit iffy for me, though jus my opinion,
(, Sun 9 Nov 2003, 22:37, archived)
# I'm looking forward
to seeing this

though not sure when that'll be :(
(, Sun 9 Nov 2003, 22:38, archived)
# nope
i'm too young to drink legally in the states. (not over in the UK, though), and it's still early, plus I have classes tomorrow.
(, Sun 9 Nov 2003, 22:33, archived)
# sorry... be more interesting
else i'll have to post my gnome pic again

Edit: made it fluffier
(, Sun 9 Nov 2003, 22:27, archived)
# as previously stated
(, Sun 9 Nov 2003, 22:29, archived)
# Scrodhilda
(, Sun 9 Nov 2003, 22:27, archived)
# The reason that it's difficult to get a picture up for any length of time
is that the board only holds 15 threads, and every new thread pushes something (possibly a picture, maybe another threadwaste) off the bottom.
(, Sun 9 Nov 2003, 22:27, archived)
# haha!
meanie
(, Sun 9 Nov 2003, 22:28, archived)
# Since when did we reintroduce the idea of threadwastes?
I thought we'd got over them long ago.
(, Sun 9 Nov 2003, 22:28, archived)
# I've always been irked by them
Anyway, I'm off for a bath to see if I can calm my raging itchiness down.
(, Sun 9 Nov 2003, 22:30, archived)
# You know,
when you change your name back, that's going to look very odd to people who spazz...
(, Sun 9 Nov 2003, 22:33, archived)
# when the "masters of the board"
reduced the number of threads to a page from 20 to 15 to make b3ta work better
(, Sun 9 Nov 2003, 22:31, archived)
# Yup
curse your quickness!
(, Sun 9 Nov 2003, 22:37, archived)
# its not too bad now
but weekday daytime the board moves so fast, TW's just cause things to drop off stupidly fast otherwise.
(, Sun 9 Nov 2003, 22:31, archived)
# I understand this.
I just don't think people should be yelled at for them. Pep has often stated that threadwastes don't exist, and the FAQ says nothing about them. Poor newbies are just trying to fit in half the time.
(, Sun 9 Nov 2003, 22:33, archived)
# I don't mind threadwastes either
people should just try and make the most out of the thread by posting old pictures they've made or something.
(, Sun 9 Nov 2003, 22:39, archived)
# there's nothing wrong with a text-only thread
but there's always cunts/new people/the mentally challenged about.
(, Sun 9 Nov 2003, 22:33, archived)
# hehe
nicely described
(, Sun 9 Nov 2003, 22:46, archived)
# I don't think we ever got over the
big board thread reduction bandwidth crisis.
(, Sun 9 Nov 2003, 22:35, archived)
# That
is a great way of gaining everyone's respect.
(, Sun 9 Nov 2003, 22:27, archived)
# haha
:D
(, Sun 9 Nov 2003, 22:29, archived)
# if you're worried about getting pictures in,
then don't waste time starting new threads to say that you don't have one done.
if you're just more interested in posting a lot than doing pictures, then you should stay with replying to posts, so people don't get mad
:)
(, Sun 9 Nov 2003, 22:27, archived)
# silly chicken
READ THE FAQ!
(, Sun 9 Nov 2003, 22:30, archived)
# PICTURE!
example:
(, Sun 9 Nov 2003, 22:30, archived)
# Haha bears in hats
in tourist resorts that what we come here for.
(, Sun 9 Nov 2003, 22:32, archived)
# thats pissing woo
that is!
(, Sun 9 Nov 2003, 22:32, archived)
# I never thought a polarbear could
look cockney.
(, Sun 9 Nov 2003, 22:50, archived)
# bloody tourists

(, Sun 9 Nov 2003, 22:53, archived)
# haha
:)
(, Sun 9 Nov 2003, 22:54, archived)