
Couldn't be arsed to read it all, anyone care to give me a summary?
( ,
Wed 21 Apr 2004, 16:43,
archived)

may be the incorrect model of the one authorities say hit the tower and may have been adapted to fire missiles.
( ,
Wed 21 Apr 2004, 16:45,
archived)

Fired missiles into it a split second before impact. And the evidence is quite sound.
Something in a cigar shape does launch off and explodes through the windows before the actual plane touches the building.
Scary
( ,
Wed 21 Apr 2004, 16:45,
archived)
Something in a cigar shape does launch off and explodes through the windows before the actual plane touches the building.
Scary

why bother with missiles when you already have a large plane full of fuel?
( ,
Wed 21 Apr 2004, 16:54,
archived)

that the USA did the twin towers with missles launched from modified aircraft, then blew them up with bombs inside the buildings to demolish them.
( ,
Wed 21 Apr 2004, 16:46,
archived)