b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 3697270 (Thread)

# this is sooo NSFW
and it's probably been done a lot better and a lot less crudely before.

edit: sorry, i didn't think anyone would be working at this time, so here's a linky
(, Thu 9 Sep 2004, 22:28, archived)
# ARGH THE NSFW
LINK IT LINK IT! ARGH!
(, Thu 9 Sep 2004, 22:29, archived)
# erm
if you have any doubt that its NSFW you should probably link it. Warning us that its 'sooo NSFW' really isn't good enough.

edt: it's not really NSFW, i was meerly warning you for next time you have any doubts, better to link it and be told its SFW than the other way round.
(, Thu 9 Sep 2004, 22:29, archived)
# Haha
I'd say it's SFW, doesn't look like porn at a glance
(, Thu 9 Sep 2004, 22:30, archived)
# seemless
(, Thu 9 Sep 2004, 22:31, archived)
# couldnt have said it
better myself... unless i spelt it correctly of course :)
(, Thu 9 Sep 2004, 22:31, archived)
# keep forgetting
how to spell "seem"




(, Thu 9 Sep 2004, 22:33, archived)
# Seem is spelt 'seam'.
(, Thu 9 Sep 2004, 22:36, archived)
# Unless of course
you're trying to spell 'seem'.
(, Thu 9 Sep 2004, 22:46, archived)
# The question is:
would you?
The answer is: Nooooooooooooooo!
(, Thu 9 Sep 2004, 22:32, archived)
# An interesting play on man's
subconscious fear of the vagina. It's not really NSFW. No-one is going to mistake it for porn.
(, Thu 9 Sep 2004, 22:33, archived)