hmm, real quick, and real dirty
/edit - safe search was ON
/edit2 - better?
From the Greetings Cards For Any Occasion challenge. See all 489 entries (closed)
( , Sat 18 Dec 2004, 19:35, archived)
/edit - safe search was ON
/edit2 - better?
From the Greetings Cards For Any Occasion challenge. See all 489 entries (closed)
( , Sat 18 Dec 2004, 19:35, archived)
i cant see any nipple,
penis or flange, so, i would say it was fairly acceptable for work, plus its pretty small
( ,
Sat 18 Dec 2004, 19:39,
archived)
it doesnt need nipple penis or flange to be NSFW
and the size is not an issue, it just mkaes it slightly tougher for a boss to notice
( ,
Sat 18 Dec 2004, 19:40,
archived)
it's probably highly acceptable at work
if it's at a 'porn' shoot, like where the recipient of the card might be working!
( ,
Sat 18 Dec 2004, 19:40,
archived)
true you'd need a boss like this to notice that:
but it still looks like porn (because it is porn)
( ,
Sat 18 Dec 2004, 19:40,
archived)
but it still looks like porn (because it is porn)
thankyou :o)
and why blur it when it can just be linked? (that's not necessarily aimed at you reckless)
( ,
Sat 18 Dec 2004, 19:47,
archived)
and if people who've seen it (ie: us)
think it's not safe for work, you can bet a boss seeing it'll think the same
( ,
Sat 18 Dec 2004, 19:44,
archived)
BASIC TEST OF NSFWidness.
Would your Boss/Mum/Significant-otter have a fit if they peeked over your shoulder and saw that picture?
/case closed.
( ,
Sat 18 Dec 2004, 19:43,
archived)
Would your Boss/Mum/Significant-otter have a fit if they peeked over your shoulder and saw that picture?
/case closed.
My Mum would have a fit at most of the pics on this site
maybe she's epileptic
( ,
Sat 18 Dec 2004, 19:57,
archived)