b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » Message 4732504 (Thread)

# How about a free
Japanese-English dictionary?

(, Sun 5 Jun 2005, 19:17, archived)
# Tibet is China
(, Sun 5 Jun 2005, 19:18, archived)
# I know
but these are Japanese characters, no? Could be wrong though, you have been to China and might be a better judge on that.
(, Sun 5 Jun 2005, 19:22, archived)
# No, certainly not disputing that, it looks like Japanese to me also
(, Sun 5 Jun 2005, 19:23, archived)
# Come to think of it
a Japanese to Chinese dictionary might be even more useful since it is definitely targeted at the Chinese market. Do you see any chance for this product in China?
(, Sun 5 Jun 2005, 19:36, archived)
# They hate the Japanese currently
Maybe in a few years. They'll probably still hate them though, they've hated them for a pretty long time...
(, Sun 5 Jun 2005, 19:42, archived)
# And the Japanese didn't do much
to give the Chinese any good reason to like them.
(, Sun 5 Jun 2005, 19:44, archived)
# Yup,
definitely Japanese.
(, Sun 5 Jun 2005, 19:24, archived)
# this
(, Sun 5 Jun 2005, 19:37, archived)
#
ありがとうございます!
(, Sun 5 Jun 2005, 19:41, archived)
# all right then, since you ask so nicely
*bends over*
(, Sun 5 Jun 2005, 20:19, archived)
# seconded
although it's not really japanese... just english in a japanese script.
(, Sun 5 Jun 2005, 19:41, archived)
# Except
for the bits in Japanese :)
(, Sun 5 Jun 2005, 19:46, archived)
# but you have to admit,
only Japanese (and occasionally people iin korea) use that.
(, Sun 5 Jun 2005, 19:56, archived)
# NO!
Tibet is Tibet. It does NOT belong to China. Their government is a bunch of cnuts and their army should be imprisoned.
(, Sun 5 Jun 2005, 19:34, archived)
# Something
like this ^
(, Sun 5 Jun 2005, 19:39, archived)
# Yep
try and imprision THE BIGGEST ARMY ON EARTH.
that's sure going to happen
(, Sun 5 Jun 2005, 19:40, archived)
# Oh for fucks sake
I'm not making a political statement, I'm making a geographical statement. Tibet IS China, it shouldn't be, but it is.
(, Sun 5 Jun 2005, 19:43, archived)