Bah..........I don't draw that kind of stuff. If my (anthro) work's ever saucy, it's usually for the sake of humour.
What's this gripe people seem to have with animal-themed characters? Have they never watched a Warner Bros cartoon?
(What's this gripe people seem to have with animal-themed characters? Have they never watched a Warner Bros cartoon?
JollyJack - a stench from the past,
Thu 9 Jun 2005, 17:06,
archived)
Your stuff is alright butI think a combination of the Thundercats and the Cadburys Caramel Bunny really screwed up a generation of kids somewhere along the line.
(
Spunk Murphy Tchaikovsky is a synonym for fanny, apparently,
Thu 9 Jun 2005, 17:18,
archived)
oh no...no gripe in general...just with the sex involved therein
(,
Thu 9 Jun 2005, 17:21,
archived)
well...it's more about the people who draw/wank to that sort of stuff isn't it?
The concept of a furry convention however still scares the shit out of me.
(,
Thu 9 Jun 2005, 17:33,
archived)
The concept of a furry convention however still scares the shit out of me.
I'm weird, I don't see them as anthropomorphised animalsI seem them as humans with animal characteristics.
(
Cadmus has teh uplikn coeds at,
Thu 9 Jun 2005, 17:32,
archived)
It depends how they're donei draw the line between the "catgirl" thing, where it's just a person with stuff like ears and a tail attached and anthro as the facial and body features and the presence of full body fur.
what freaks me out is the people who draw themselves as "furries". I think that's kinda scary.
(,
Thu 9 Jun 2005, 17:38,
archived)
what freaks me out is the people who draw themselves as "furries". I think that's kinda scary.