There's a remake on the way
click for pic (nsfw)
mod edit: sorry - it kind of looks like porn because it it porn...
( ,
Thu 9 Jun 2005, 20:03,
archived)
mod edit: sorry - it kind of looks like porn because it it porn...
I wouldnt be surprised if that had be done
but with a white guy and a room full of black guys.
edit: oh and i'm very curious as to how you got the source for this
( ,
Thu 9 Jun 2005, 20:05,
archived)
edit: oh and i'm very curious as to how you got the source for this
Which led me to this...
www.master.pl/~litek/2/
How can you resist a page of images like "spontan balum balum taribariba.jpg"?
Edit: Damn Polish server appears to be made from wet cardboard.
( ,
Thu 9 Jun 2005, 20:11,
archived)
How can you resist a page of images like "spontan balum balum taribariba.jpg"?
Edit: Damn Polish server appears to be made from wet cardboard.
no
that was Willy Wanker's Candy
Fuctory - a couple of girls, midgets and lots of chocolate in the bit I saw
( ,
Thu 9 Jun 2005, 22:31,
archived)
Fuctory - a couple of girls, midgets and lots of chocolate in the bit I saw
i share this confusion
wow, that was on auto complete
edit: and it seems we shall forever be in the dark
( ,
Thu 9 Jun 2005, 20:09,
archived)
edit: and it seems we shall forever be in the dark
Eeeeuuurrrghhh!!!
I hate to think what sites you were on to find a picture like that.
Woo all the more.
( ,
Thu 9 Jun 2005, 20:06,
archived)
Woo all the more.
yes there is,
which is utter bullshite, I'm sure. Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory is pure utter untainted gold, and Gene Wilder is a god. There is absolutely no reason for a remake.
/infuriates
( ,
Thu 9 Jun 2005, 20:07,
archived)
/infuriates
It was a book first, you know.
Therefore it's not a remake, it's a new adaptation of the same book. Also, Tim Burton has scrapped plans to set fire to every single copy of the Gene Wilder film in existence, so you needn't worry.
( ,
Thu 9 Jun 2005, 20:12,
archived)
fuck off,
I know it is a book. The film is fucking MAGIC though. MAGIC!
*waves hands mysteriously*
( ,
Thu 9 Jun 2005, 20:18,
archived)
*waves hands mysteriously*
I thought about it for a while, and it is SFW.
I cut off the ... unsafe parts from the bottom of the picture.
Edit: apparently I'm wrong. Apologies to all affected.
( ,
Thu 9 Jun 2005, 20:11,
archived)
Edit: apparently I'm wrong. Apologies to all affected.
well no
it would be fine to have an image made out of vaginas, cocks and shit-smeared anuses, so long as it didn't look like porn. That includes looking like mutant-fetish porn.
( ,
Thu 9 Jun 2005, 20:12,
archived)
I love how you guys think you're the final authority on what is
and isn't safe for work. It's very endearing.
( ,
Thu 9 Jun 2005, 20:13,
archived)