
It's not so much that I think the subject should not be mentioned, just that if you're going to use it, at least make sure your joke contains genuine humour.
( ,
Mon 14 May 2007, 16:11,
archived)

I find the whole notion of a huge, celebrity and newspaper endorsed reward repulsively self-serving, so I shopped my thoughts below
Criticise on the actual thread if you would, you're just cluttering up this one unfairly...
( ,
Mon 14 May 2007, 16:15,
archived)
Criticise on the actual thread if you would, you're just cluttering up this one unfairly...

Just sort of in general.
I'll go and have a look now.
( ,
Mon 14 May 2007, 16:16,
archived)
I'll go and have a look now.

If I want to post here, I fucking will.
( ,
Mon 14 May 2007, 16:16,
archived)

*awards gold star*
upmost utmost ;-)
( ,
Mon 14 May 2007, 16:18,
archived)

I'm SO sorry for making one spelling error too. English is not my first language yet I have a degree in it, so I clearly know a hell of a lot more than you. Dickwad.
( ,
Mon 14 May 2007, 16:30,
archived)

I'm all for free speech and that, but I don't think shock is a substitute for humour.
( ,
Mon 14 May 2007, 16:15,
archived)

and shock can be a form of humour in itself.
( ,
Mon 14 May 2007, 16:23,
archived)

she's telling people not to post jokes about the missing child thingy. that seems to be a contradiction with being 'for' free speech, no?
"Please stop posting shops about that poor Madeline kid."
( ,
Mon 14 May 2007, 16:30,
archived)
"Please stop posting shops about that poor Madeline kid."

No contradiction at all. She's asking people to use their right to free speech in way that is respectful for her feelings.
If she was appealing to rob or to a mod to limit other people's free speech, then she would be against free speech.
( ,
Mon 14 May 2007, 18:21,
archived)
If she was appealing to rob or to a mod to limit other people's free speech, then she would be against free speech.

Free speech is not the art of shocking someone as a replacement for humour. Tool.
( ,
Mon 14 May 2007, 16:31,
archived)

i'm saying that being for free speech and telling people what they can and can't post on here is incompatible. clear enough now?
Edit: tool? i just pointed out a contradiction in your supposed values and you resort to a childish insult? your high and mighty attitude doesn't look too credible really.
( ,
Mon 14 May 2007, 16:33,
archived)
Edit: tool? i just pointed out a contradiction in your supposed values and you resort to a childish insult? your high and mighty attitude doesn't look too credible really.

I asked people not to post unfunny shit. Take note.
( ,
Mon 14 May 2007, 16:38,
archived)

you specifically said no posts about "that madeline kid". you can't change what you said now, for it is written.
( ,
Mon 14 May 2007, 16:39,
archived)

is the subject of the current piss-poor bandwagon.
If you have a problem with me, stick me on ignore, I have a pile of work to do and yet I'm wasting it talking to a cunt like you.
( ,
Mon 14 May 2007, 16:42,
archived)
If you have a problem with me, stick me on ignore, I have a pile of work to do and yet I'm wasting it talking to a cunt like you.

i hope you don't thave children...
"Now kids, if anybody points out your fallacious reasoning, be sure to call them a cunt. that'll learn 'em."
( ,
Mon 14 May 2007, 16:49,
archived)
"Now kids, if anybody points out your fallacious reasoning, be sure to call them a cunt. that'll learn 'em."