And here's another one in the same thread
A Word version of Loss (1964).
The rows should really have been smaller to get them looking right, but It was impossible to get them so.
From the Office Art challenge. See all 328 entries (closed)
( , Wed 6 Jun 2007, 15:53, archived)
A Word version of Loss (1964).
The rows should really have been smaller to get them looking right, but It was impossible to get them so.
From the Office Art challenge. See all 328 entries (closed)
( , Wed 6 Jun 2007, 15:53, archived)
i'm flattered that you think that i'd have a clue who bridget riley is :)
( ,
Wed 6 Jun 2007, 15:57,
archived)
see the
link that was in my first post (http://nadav.harel.org.il/Bridget_Riley/).
She painted optical illusions and stripes and stuff. Much of it is just stripes, a bit like Damien Hirst's dot paintings, but some of it is cool. Her style became known as op-art
( ,
Wed 6 Jun 2007, 16:14,
archived)
She painted optical illusions and stripes and stuff. Much of it is just stripes, a bit like Damien Hirst's dot paintings, but some of it is cool. Her style became known as op-art
i know who she is
and you're god knows how many centuries older than i am
haha.
*cough*artist*cough*
( ,
Wed 6 Jun 2007, 16:00,
archived)
haha.
*cough*artist*cough*
Well Cool
Like that very much. This is exactly the sort of nerdy thing I like doing.
All I've managed in Word are a couple of crappy Mondrians, but they're easy peasy.
These look well classy. I was going to have a go at Riley's INTAKE, but I'm still floored.
(I pea-roasted an Excel Mona Lisa from ages ago, see compo entries from last night)
Well done, mate.
( ,
Wed 6 Jun 2007, 18:35,
archived)
All I've managed in Word are a couple of crappy Mondrians, but they're easy peasy.
These look well classy. I was going to have a go at Riley's INTAKE, but I'm still floored.
(I pea-roasted an Excel Mona Lisa from ages ago, see compo entries from last night)
Well done, mate.