![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
*spurt* *spurt* *spurt* *spurt* *spurt* *spurt* *spurt* *spurt* *spurt*
That'll show them
( ,
Mon 18 Jun 2007, 22:44,
archived)
That'll show them
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
give me a few moments to build up a second batch
and I'll give it some welly!
( ,
Mon 18 Jun 2007, 22:46,
archived)
and I'll give it some welly!
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
/might have just about got the hang of this
( ,
Tue 19 Jun 2007, 0:45,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
If the Henry says that he lies all the time and that he tells the truth all the time then he can be neither of these, in which case they are both lies and therefore he did not abuse the pot.
This means that the pot must be lying about the Henry abusing him, but the sofa states that he lies half the time AND the pot lies half the time and these cannot be true unless the pot also lies all the time.
If this is the case then the sofa would have to tell the truth all the time which he clearly doesn't.
Unless The Pot is unaware that he is wrong about Henry it just doesn't work.
( ,
Mon 18 Jun 2007, 22:58,
archived)
This means that the pot must be lying about the Henry abusing him, but the sofa states that he lies half the time AND the pot lies half the time and these cannot be true unless the pot also lies all the time.
If this is the case then the sofa would have to tell the truth all the time which he clearly doesn't.
Unless The Pot is unaware that he is wrong about Henry it just doesn't work.
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
which means he didn't molest the pot.
So why does the pot say that the hoover did?
Conspiracy!
( ,
Mon 18 Jun 2007, 23:11,
archived)
So why does the pot say that the hoover did?
Conspiracy!