
(no borrowed source pics or owt)
( ,
Fri 22 Jun 2007, 17:14,
archived)

this is a pretty vague area as the creator of the composite should have certain rights.
I was given a consultation by a top IP lawyer just the other week (covered by a generous blog visitor).
However, it is something that emap can use to obfuscate the issue and delay settlement.
Believe it or not, Emap's lawyers - correction highlighted a recent report about intellectual property.
"Alexander Ross (from company that represents emap - my words) points out that the recent Gowers Review of intellectual property has recommended allowing free usage of pictures for satirical purposes. This would certainly be embraced by Rob Manuel of b3ta.com, a frequently hilarious site that thrives on its users scooping images from the internet and tinkering with them in Photoshop."
the story goes on with a quote from some ginger bloke :
"If you don't want to see your work used, then never show it to anyone." - Rob Manuel.
news.independent.co.uk/sci_tech/article2484225.ece
( ,
Fri 22 Jun 2007, 17:21,
archived)
I was given a consultation by a top IP lawyer just the other week (covered by a generous blog visitor).
However, it is something that emap can use to obfuscate the issue and delay settlement.
Believe it or not, Emap's lawyers - correction highlighted a recent report about intellectual property.
"Alexander Ross (from company that represents emap - my words) points out that the recent Gowers Review of intellectual property has recommended allowing free usage of pictures for satirical purposes. This would certainly be embraced by Rob Manuel of b3ta.com, a frequently hilarious site that thrives on its users scooping images from the internet and tinkering with them in Photoshop."
the story goes on with a quote from some ginger bloke :
"If you don't want to see your work used, then never show it to anyone." - Rob Manuel.
news.independent.co.uk/sci_tech/article2484225.ece

yes, and I should be allowed to punch who I please
( ,
Fri 22 Jun 2007, 17:23,
archived)

It's months until my guilt trip phone call from my grandparents.
( ,
Fri 22 Jun 2007, 17:24,
archived)

it's when it's used for other people's profit when I get annoyed.
I think you've mentioned that actually.
( ,
Fri 22 Jun 2007, 17:31,
archived)
I think you've mentioned that actually.

it's when people make money or gain free marketing capital out of it.
As
Sony Pictures Home Entertainment
Universal Pictures
20th Century Fox Home Entertainment
Icon Home Entertainment
Warner Home Video
Carphone Warehouse
Entertainment Arts
Momentum Pictures
Pathe Distribution Limited
Blaupunkt
and other companies do when they dole out prizes via Zoo to people who send our creations in.
( ,
Fri 22 Jun 2007, 17:37,
archived)
As
Sony Pictures Home Entertainment
Universal Pictures
20th Century Fox Home Entertainment
Icon Home Entertainment
Warner Home Video
Carphone Warehouse
Entertainment Arts
Momentum Pictures
Pathe Distribution Limited
Blaupunkt
and other companies do when they dole out prizes via Zoo to people who send our creations in.

... and sometimes this is used in a rather cynical and overbearing fashion, but for now, I'll restrict my comment to Rob's quote:
We all gotta eat. Many of us use the interwebs to promote our talent and allowing the free/conditional exchange of watermarked work is part of that - but when there's profit to be had, we will want and deserve our fair share (whatever that may be). I doubt Rob gave this same advice to Joel during the recent Coke unpleasantness:
www.robmanuel.com/2006/12/13/is-coke-ripping-off-the-little-guy/
( ,
Fri 22 Jun 2007, 17:42,
archived)
We all gotta eat. Many of us use the interwebs to promote our talent and allowing the free/conditional exchange of watermarked work is part of that - but when there's profit to be had, we will want and deserve our fair share (whatever that may be). I doubt Rob gave this same advice to Joel during the recent Coke unpleasantness:
www.robmanuel.com/2006/12/13/is-coke-ripping-off-the-little-guy/