
are called 'Jaffacakes' and not 'Jaffa biscuits' because it's a tax break

( ,
Fri 30 Nov 2007, 11:41,
archived)


It's was at breakfast after the last Derby bash in fact.
Chunderbunny told us =)
( ,
Fri 30 Nov 2007, 11:42,
archived)
Chunderbunny told us =)

but there was a court case ages ago to confirm that they were cakes, not biscuits. (and so exempt from vat or something? why are biscuits considered taxable, but cakes a non-taxable essential food?)
( ,
Fri 30 Nov 2007, 11:44,
archived)

but CHOCOLATE COVERED biscuits are a luxury item and hence are
( ,
Fri 30 Nov 2007, 11:46,
archived)

it all makes a kind of sense
chocolate-covering is too much a part of many cakes for it to be considered additional luxury
( ,
Fri 30 Nov 2007, 11:49,
archived)
chocolate-covering is too much a part of many cakes for it to be considered additional luxury

isn't a luxury?
What about chocolate covered Kate? ;)
( ,
Fri 30 Nov 2007, 11:49,
archived)
What about chocolate covered Kate? ;)