
The Palace (fuck off am I calling it PooPoo or whatever) is still there, but it smells strange without the fags.
( ,
Wed 12 Dec 2007, 13:50,
archived)

It's horrifying. Right down to the token punk with a sign they've drawn onto the "imaginings" to say 'look, you can still hang out here, even though all your favourite shops are gone!'
Bastards.
( ,
Wed 12 Dec 2007, 13:52,
archived)
Bastards.

the market before the stables is gone, apparently. There was a good army surplus there, amonst other things
( ,
Wed 12 Dec 2007, 13:54,
archived)

Imagine the entirety of Camden Market removed and replaced with a soulless glass, chrome and wood edifice featuring shops with one word names like Fun, Eat, Shop etc.
What's more, the artists impression goes to great lengths to show punks and rockers 'enjoying' this new alternative haven, and pops in one token black family with a pram. The only untouched bit appears to be the Morrisons car park...
( ,
Wed 12 Dec 2007, 13:58,
archived)
What's more, the artists impression goes to great lengths to show punks and rockers 'enjoying' this new alternative haven, and pops in one token black family with a pram. The only untouched bit appears to be the Morrisons car park...

Don't they realise it's perfect the way it is?
( ,
Wed 12 Dec 2007, 14:04,
archived)

No.
Please tell me it's still going to be the same though...
( ,
Wed 12 Dec 2007, 13:56,
archived)
Please tell me it's still going to be the same though...

their response:
In terms of government policy on retail, national planning policy in Planning Policy Statement 6: Planning for Town Centres (PPS6) seeks to support a competitive retail sector and meet the needs of the community - but it is not the role of planning to restrict competition or preserve existing commercial interests. PPS6 (paragraph 2.27) also asks local authorities to seek to retain and enhance existing markets and, where appropriate, re-introduce or create new ones, as street and covered markets can make a valuable contribution to local choice and diversity in shopping as well as the vitality of town centres. Local authorities should ensure that their markets remain attractive and competitive by investing in their improvement.
Translation: the area can make more money if we make it like every other bloody shopping centre in England, so we'll do that and screw diversity.
( ,
Wed 12 Dec 2007, 14:04,
archived)
In terms of government policy on retail, national planning policy in Planning Policy Statement 6: Planning for Town Centres (PPS6) seeks to support a competitive retail sector and meet the needs of the community - but it is not the role of planning to restrict competition or preserve existing commercial interests. PPS6 (paragraph 2.27) also asks local authorities to seek to retain and enhance existing markets and, where appropriate, re-introduce or create new ones, as street and covered markets can make a valuable contribution to local choice and diversity in shopping as well as the vitality of town centres. Local authorities should ensure that their markets remain attractive and competitive by investing in their improvement.
Translation: the area can make more money if we make it like every other bloody shopping centre in England, so we'll do that and screw diversity.


not 'spend money'. Yes, the shops there did okay, but most people browsed rather than spent, and the age of the premises meant that the rents were kept low enough for the low profits to be okay for traders. The new shops will charge more, and make more because they'll sell mainstream stuff that you can buy anywhere - so why not buy it there?
( ,
Wed 12 Dec 2007, 14:07,
archived)

It was the only place to get a lot of the stuff I wanted before the net caught on in a big way.
( ,
Wed 12 Dec 2007, 14:09,
archived)

but I don't think I've bought anything there since, despite going a couple of times a year.
Don't get me wrong, I loved the old Camden, but the government is right when they argue that the area is going to make more money.
"Local authorities should ensure that their markets remain attractive and competitive by investing in their improvement." It's all down to what you classify as 'improvement'. Personally I think that they're destroying the character of the last remaining place of goth/rock culture, they think it's making the place nicer for 'normal people', I guess.
( ,
Wed 12 Dec 2007, 14:17,
archived)
Don't get me wrong, I loved the old Camden, but the government is right when they argue that the area is going to make more money.
"Local authorities should ensure that their markets remain attractive and competitive by investing in their improvement." It's all down to what you classify as 'improvement'. Personally I think that they're destroying the character of the last remaining place of goth/rock culture, they think it's making the place nicer for 'normal people', I guess.

there's no such thing as normal people, just weird people who are better at hiding it.
With luck Camden's spirit will be like a bump under the carpet: you push it down in one place and then it pops up in another.
( ,
Wed 12 Dec 2007, 14:21,
archived)
With luck Camden's spirit will be like a bump under the carpet: you push it down in one place and then it pops up in another.

Last I heard it's had a bit of a metal night but that's it. I passed it the other day and it looked the same, but I think everything's changed.
Shitty thing is the old management got given 5 days' notice.
Still, I much preferred Quinn's just up the road. At least you don't stick to everything there.
( ,
Wed 12 Dec 2007, 14:18,
archived)
Shitty thing is the old management got given 5 days' notice.
Still, I much preferred Quinn's just up the road. At least you don't stick to everything there.