You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 8133126 (Thread)

# Random victim time.


Click for bigger (94KB)

*prepares for outrage over msn and a sheadload of *SPANG!*
(NFNiTM /talk is gay, Tue 4 Mar 2008, 19:15, archived)
# Why did I click for bigger?
(I helped save b3ta! head-doctor ololololo, Tue 4 Mar 2008, 19:18, archived)
# And who is Arti Kohli?
Google was of no help.
(I helped save b3ta! NobbyNobody 21 years a b3tan, Tue 4 Mar 2008, 19:21, archived)
# ^this^
other than offering to join someone's linked in and Facebook
(I helped save b3ta! HappyToast Groat froth, Tue 4 Mar 2008, 19:23, archived)
# Sounds like a fancy dessert to me!
(I helped save b3ta! riverghost servicing your mum since, Tue 4 Mar 2008, 19:35, archived)
# [Indeed....
but your post is about 12 down on google front page...which must mean google have just run their spiders over the Ginger Fuhr's servers...
(DrZaarlon Witchspace To Ra!, Tue 4 Mar 2008, 19:52, archived)
# I'm all out of spang, I have plenty of this though.
ran·dom (rn'dm) pronunciation
adj.

1. Having no specific pattern, purpose, or objective: random movements. See synonyms at chance.
2. Mathematics & Statistics. Of or relating to a type of circumstance or event that is described by a probability distribution.
3. Of or relating to an event in which all outcomes are equally likely, as in the testing of a blood sample for the presence of a substance.
(I helped save b3ta! MrPineapple .co.uk - TSHIRTS FOR SALE. I GIVE YOU GOOD PRICE., Tue 4 Mar 2008, 19:21, archived)
# 4. kiddie-speak for- LOL IM SO KRAZY
(I helped save b3ta! NobbyNobody 21 years a b3tan, Tue 4 Mar 2008, 19:22, archived)
# CHEESE MONKEY CRACK
(I helped save b3ta! MrPineapple .co.uk - TSHIRTS FOR SALE. I GIVE YOU GOOD PRICE., Tue 4 Mar 2008, 19:23, archived)
# u r lyk totly random
xx

Edit: also,

No results found for sheadload.
Did you mean shitload (in dictionary) or Dead load (in encyclopedia)?
(I helped save b3ta! drbroon abloooobloobloo, Tue 4 Mar 2008, 19:23, archived)
# lolololol
(I helped save b3ta! MrPineapple .co.uk - TSHIRTS FOR SALE. I GIVE YOU GOOD PRICE., Tue 4 Mar 2008, 19:24, archived)
# shedload
try again
(cs192 is sucking on a Koala at, Tue 4 Mar 2008, 19:27, archived)
# i was simply being shallow and pedantic
but there are no results for "shedload" either.
(I helped save b3ta! drbroon abloooobloobloo, Tue 4 Mar 2008, 19:29, archived)
# damnit
try hyphenating

what're you searching on? www.loads.com?
(cs192 is sucking on a Koala at, Tue 4 Mar 2008, 19:32, archived)
# no
dictionary.reference.com

www.loads.com only does suffixes, it's frustrating.
(I helped save b3ta! drbroon abloooobloobloo, Tue 4 Mar 2008, 19:35, archived)
# Random as in a victim who was as likely or as unlikely to be chosen as any other?
This being pedantic about the word random is all very well when you are right, but here you are wrong.
(I helped save b3ta! LordManley twitter.com/LordManley, Tue 4 Mar 2008, 19:35, archived)
# but the random factor is controlled by the sample of possible victims
to be truly random, would require the sample not to be constricted by human names, but by all possible words, making the probability of the two words forming a person's name, very weak indeed. If it was a randomised choice within names of people, then the likelihood of a forename and a surname being chosen would also be relatively remote. If however, each name was chosen separately, the forename from a sample of all possible forenames, plus the surname from a sample of all possible surnames, then the two samples become considerably constricted from the starting point. The fact that the outcome results in the name of an existing person further calls the randomness of the process into question, as well as the fact that the two names appear to be from similar ethnic roots.

This leads me to question whether it was random at all, I agree with Mr Pineapple.
(I helped save b3ta! drbroon abloooobloobloo, Tue 4 Mar 2008, 19:43, archived)
# Without reading any of that
It's basically my point.

I somehow doubt that I was in the running to be picked for this, so I do not believe random sampling was inferred.

Also, even if it was, I highly doubt that they were referring to their sampling method, rather than just being all "lol, random"
(I helped save b3ta! MrPineapple .co.uk - TSHIRTS FOR SALE. I GIVE YOU GOOD PRICE., Tue 4 Mar 2008, 19:46, archived)
# didn't read any of it?
but i did it for you :(

You have made the point a little more concisely.
(I helped save b3ta! drbroon abloooobloobloo, Tue 4 Mar 2008, 19:51, archived)
# I did read it afterwards
Don't worry :)
(I helped save b3ta! MrPineapple .co.uk - TSHIRTS FOR SALE. I GIVE YOU GOOD PRICE., Tue 4 Mar 2008, 19:53, archived)
# But if you were to randomly choose a victim,
your phase space would be 'potential victims', not 'two words'. In which case, this could be a random victim.
Probably isn't, though.
(I helped save b3ta! my other username is a porsche , posting shit pictures so you don't have to, Tue 4 Mar 2008, 19:49, archived)