b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » Low Budget Film Remakes » Message 8566879

[challenge entry] may contain repost..

From the Low Budget Film Remakes challenge. See all 715 entries (closed)

(, Thu 17 Jul 2008, 11:37, archived)
# how is this compo related?
(, Thu 17 Jul 2008, 11:38, archived)
#
it just is
(, Thu 17 Jul 2008, 11:39, archived)
# Oh christicakes!
(, Thu 17 Jul 2008, 11:39, archived)
#
(, Thu 17 Jul 2008, 11:39, archived)
# swine
(, Thu 17 Jul 2008, 11:40, archived)
# oink!
(, Thu 17 Jul 2008, 11:41, archived)
# that's just taking the piss.
reposting something because it's fucking film related? Did you even read the challenge brief?
(, Thu 17 Jul 2008, 11:40, archived)
# I did yes,
and I thought "sounds like an excuse for a repost" :-)
(, Thu 17 Jul 2008, 11:41, archived)
# there is no excuse for a repost
because it says so in the faq. And the fact you think it is OK to post your shit again and put other people's work off the page means you have no respect for other people here.
(, Thu 17 Jul 2008, 11:45, archived)
#
I think the picture's suitability for the compo is somewhat open to interpretation, and in my opinion it's just as relevant, if not as impressive or funny as a lot of other entries.
Yes, I accept the the fact that I've posted it before goes against convention and I appologise to whoever's work I may have pushed off the board.
I'm not going to delete the thread, and I'm not going to be bullied by a small number unnecessarily zealous board nazis.
I have great respect for the posters here, I have no intention of offending anybody. I think referring to other people's work as 'shit', however, shows far more disrespect than i have.
(, Thu 17 Jul 2008, 11:59, archived)
# That's not disrespect.
it's critique.

And what part of low budget does your post represent?
Oh I know, we need to make a film, we have no money. Let's get Will Smith though and er, we'll not do the original title, we'll change it to something about horses. That's fantastic, we could not have done it for any less.

All you have done is what many other casual posters do. You see the word film, you snaffle a poster and change the title like you are some kind of comic luminary. Join the queue.
Sorry if you feel I'm being disrespectful but there is a good reason for it. It's because I have no respect for you.
(, Thu 17 Jul 2008, 12:05, archived)
# "casual posters"
Have you heard yourself ?
(, Thu 17 Jul 2008, 14:21, archived)
# if I may summarize:
"Fuck off, you didn't try very hard at that."

"No I didn't."
(, Fri 18 Jul 2008, 1:58, archived)
# Why repost when the board's moving so quickly?
You're just shoving stuff people have tried hard on off the board even quicker.

Also, it's only tenuously compo related at best.
(, Thu 17 Jul 2008, 11:40, archived)
#
I actutally thought it was quite relevant (if a little tenuous), and i wanted to compo it.
that is all.
(, Thu 17 Jul 2008, 11:42, archived)
# Well I 'actutally' would beg to differ.
Also: never work in a career that requires working to a brief.
(, Thu 17 Jul 2008, 11:44, archived)
# it has fuck all to do with the compo
but if you want to compo old stuff you put it in an existing thread and do it then.
(, Thu 17 Jul 2008, 11:46, archived)
# Well, I think horses are a bit cheaper than robots?
Unless they're tiny little clockwork robots...

*has an idea*
(, Thu 17 Jul 2008, 12:08, archived)
# Good luck
I hope you win
(, Thu 17 Jul 2008, 11:54, archived)