I remember a great series Robert Llewelyn did about movie science.
It was fab to see how Hollywood made up science stuff.
( ,
Mon 1 Sep 2008, 17:07,
archived)
the problem is not only what they make up
but how they represent the entire scientific environment
( ,
Mon 1 Sep 2008, 17:11,
archived)
Also how people actually believe it.
I hate movies that get basic science wrong, especially physics.
( ,
Mon 1 Sep 2008, 17:15,
archived)
Like that the trailer for wanted, which while one could forgive the ridiculous premise of being able to spin a bullet.
It's less forgivable that he seemed to be aiming at the target and then spinning it away, rather than aiming away and then spinning it at the target.
( ,
Mon 1 Sep 2008, 17:19,
archived)
It doesn't mean they have to be written by idiots though.
All they would have to do is do it the other way round and it would have at least obeyed logic!
( ,
Mon 1 Sep 2008, 17:22,
archived)
But the last bullet spin of the film even got me thinking "No way"
( ,
Mon 1 Sep 2008, 17:24,
archived)
I would not know.
I have not seen the film due to HAVING STANDARDS!
( ,
Mon 1 Sep 2008, 17:26,
archived)
Yes I know,
but it won't kill someone to do some actual research in how thing do/might happen.
( ,
Mon 1 Sep 2008, 17:23,
archived)
If there isn't any actual science in it
Surely it's just fiction?
( ,
Tue 2 Sep 2008, 23:32,
archived)
outrunning explosions
especially down corridors
cos shockwaves only go at like 10mph don't they
( ,
Wed 3 Sep 2008, 1:00,
archived)
cos shockwaves only go at like 10mph don't they
Bad movie physics
are hated by these people
www.intuitor.com/moviephysics/
Though I do wonder if they take it too far from time to time.
The cigarettes as lighters bits looks fun to do...
( ,
Wed 3 Sep 2008, 20:36,
archived)
www.intuitor.com/moviephysics/
Though I do wonder if they take it too far from time to time.
The cigarettes as lighters bits looks fun to do...