people
will get angry at you having posted that. trust me. i personally am not bothered, but it's not a good way to get people on your side.
edit: *points down* told you so.
( ,
Wed 5 Mar 2003, 11:45,
archived)
edit: *points down* told you so.
When you start a new "thread"
you knock an old one off the bottom, which might have someone's painstakingly-drawn picture on it.
It's considered good manners not to start threads without a picture or an important thing to say. You could've told us it was out of your system by replying to the earlier thread.
And Stouff, menub - stop being obstructive.
( ,
Wed 5 Mar 2003, 11:47,
archived)
It's considered good manners not to start threads without a picture or an important thing to say. You could've told us it was out of your system by replying to the earlier thread.
And Stouff, menub - stop being obstructive.
*points
up to playstation stuff*
see. i was right. la la la la la.
( ,
Wed 5 Mar 2003, 11:58,
archived)
see. i was right. la la la la la.
and if stouffer jumped off a cliff,
would you?
don't answer that.
( ,
Wed 5 Mar 2003, 11:49,
archived)
don't answer that.
what do you mean "turned into"?
i've seen her with her stylish cardigans.
the evidence is irref.. irefut.. er. can't be argued against!
( ,
Wed 5 Mar 2003, 11:53,
archived)
the evidence is irref.. irefut.. er. can't be argued against!
He is,
a young man in a much younger man's body.
Also I think he may be the second coming.
( ,
Wed 5 Mar 2003, 11:47,
archived)
Also I think he may be the second coming.
better get some tissues...
by the by.... you never answered in the spazz... bbc why?
( ,
Wed 5 Mar 2003, 11:54,
archived)