b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » Photoshop the US Election » Message 8897725

[challenge entry] TV Themed



From the Photoshop the US Election challenge. See all 478 entries (closed)

(, Mon 3 Nov 2008, 1:03, archived)
# I wish James Khan was my dad
He's so cuddly.
(, Mon 3 Nov 2008, 1:05, archived)
# That first one is fucking ace!
Your second is damn good too!
(, Mon 3 Nov 2008, 1:10, archived)
# The only person in the first one
who looks even vaguely sane is McCain

Edit: in fact he looks like their stern but indulgent carer, taking them out on a day trip.
(, Mon 3 Nov 2008, 1:12, archived)
# I think Obama looks the best.
(, Mon 3 Nov 2008, 1:14, archived)
# Pfft!
n00b.
(, Mon 3 Nov 2008, 1:24, archived)
# And that is the sad reality :(
:D
(, Mon 3 Nov 2008, 1:25, archived)
# Just so we're clear
I don't get a vote here. But I certainly would not vote for McCain.
McCain favours the dissolution of Network Neutrality on the internet. He wants to leave all that stuff up to the corporations to resolve, because he's a fairly dogmatic free market man at heart.
If you don't know what Network Neutrality is all about or why you should care about it, it might be worth looking into it. It potentially effects everyone who uses the Internet, and it's not some vague threat, it's actively being discussed right now. There are trillions of dollars to be made. That tends to get people talking here.
(, Mon 3 Nov 2008, 1:43, archived)
# has this got anything to do with
the hing about changes in copyright i saw a video warning about it...

vagueness to the max.

soemthing like if it's passed asa law mr.vietch wouldn'tof had a leg to stand on against coca cola..
(, Mon 3 Nov 2008, 1:47, archived)
# As I understand it
this is more about whether the people who supply the actual cables, tubes, etc., get to have any say about what is sent along those cables.
The way things are set up at the moment, the networks is neutral, meaning content can be carried on any part of the network regardless of ownership.

Edit: I just read that back and it sounds innocuous. But I think it may come down to; do you want BT deciding what content can be carried to your house and what can't?
(, Mon 3 Nov 2008, 1:53, archived)
# yeah i got the implication
basically they can syphon of areas of the internet and decide that you should be charged extra to see them.. brought in under the guise of protecting children or some other such vunerable subsection of society so you look like a pervert and a reprobate for apposing it.
(, Mon 3 Nov 2008, 2:07, archived)
# I think the EU would quite like to have a role as caretaker of the internet
and I think I'd quite like that not to happen. Though Europeans in general may be more pro-free-market than the US on this one.
"Most were wary of prescriptive regulation, which had to be technical by nature, when no harm had been caused and the problem couldn't be described."
(, Mon 3 Nov 2008, 7:49, archived)
# Carer?
Minder more like, a decent company man reinforcing the company line. The freemarket is right (except when we need bailing out to the tune of billions).
(, Mon 3 Nov 2008, 3:07, archived)
# I want fifty thousand pounds please
*vomits green stuff*

woo :)

/even though thats the dragon's den.. but i thoughts that what the top one was untill i only just now read the apprentice

I'm out, I'm out, I'm out.
(, Mon 3 Nov 2008, 1:14, archived)
# Ha ha ha!
Are you drunk again?
(, Mon 3 Nov 2008, 1:26, archived)
# I'm going on about this
(, Mon 3 Nov 2008, 1:29, archived)
# Joe Biden?
no?
(, Mon 3 Nov 2008, 1:17, archived)
# Hahahah I like this
(, Mon 3 Nov 2008, 1:19, archived)