
God forbid I upset someone with a usernumber higher than 50000
( ,
Mon 26 Jan 2009, 19:58,
archived)

Why do people always assume that? I'm just mildly amused when I feel like lambasting someone for being selfish when posting on b3ta. It has nothing to do with me at the end of the day. I just enjoy seeing arseholes bite.
( ,
Mon 26 Jan 2009, 20:02,
archived)

Now if you are going to do nothing but follow me around making comments that are clearly designed to get a rise out of me we shall have to part company.
( ,
Mon 26 Jan 2009, 20:07,
archived)

Replying to your posts isn't following you around. This isn't your private board.
( ,
Mon 26 Jan 2009, 20:13,
archived)

You have given me the impression over the last few days that you are trying to get a rise out of my with your unsolicited replies in my conversations with others.
( ,
Mon 26 Jan 2009, 20:17,
archived)

I'm sorry if it didn't mention that in the faq, but there we are.
( ,
Mon 26 Jan 2009, 20:20,
archived)

If you are going to respond to me and expect a civil conversation then please have the courtesy not to respond to things I have not written and use that as some kind of debating tactic.
( ,
Mon 26 Jan 2009, 20:22,
archived)

I'm just calling you out on using /board to threaten physical violence. That's all.
( ,
Mon 26 Jan 2009, 20:27,
archived)

You are another one of these people who likes to pick words out of a paragraph and then invent a meaning that suits your argument and I find it tedious and irritating.
I've left it there by the way but feel free to respond so that others can see you making an effort.
( ,
Mon 26 Jan 2009, 20:30,
archived)
I've left it there by the way but feel free to respond so that others can see you making an effort.

Just for that, I am putting you on ignore.
ON IGNORE.
( ,
Mon 26 Jan 2009, 20:09,
archived)
ON IGNORE.

I've mentioned that I'll lamp a couple of people if I meet them. It's fully justified in my opinion and I'm not being in the slightest bit angry about it.
I don't understand why people equate violence with anger. It's perfectly reasonable to teach someone some manners without getting angry about it.
( ,
Mon 26 Jan 2009, 20:11,
archived)
I don't understand why people equate violence with anger. It's perfectly reasonable to teach someone some manners without getting angry about it.

but it's more a result of two people going beyond the usual abuse at me and being rather hateful about my mother and my wife. I'll just make them understand that there are consequences to that kind of behaviour if the opportunity arises. It's not like I'm screaming revenge and threatening anyone. Anger is a very bad fault to have if you are going to get yourself involved in fighting of any kind.
( ,
Mon 26 Jan 2009, 20:16,
archived)

in the army violence is/can be a job.
( ,
Mon 26 Jan 2009, 20:30,
archived)