
in your marvellous little dictionary. Nothing.
So what's it mean?
( ,
Mon 9 Feb 2009, 10:40,
archived)
So what's it mean?

Actually,
Chag is my own made-up word, meaning pant gravel- a blanket term for all detritus found in a gusset after a long day. including, but not limited to, bumchunks, winnet, poo stripes etc.
( ,
Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:07,
archived)
Chag is my own made-up word, meaning pant gravel- a blanket term for all detritus found in a gusset after a long day. including, but not limited to, bumchunks, winnet, poo stripes etc.

That's my word for what you should be using a little more of.
( ,
Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:09,
archived)

are you honestly telling me that after a long hot day, perhaps walking the length of Oxford Street trying to find some matching bra and panties, your bum is still as pink and kissable as it was when you talced it after your morning bath?
( ,
Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:11,
archived)

but then it's probably because the torrent of sweat off my back washes everything down through the legs of my boxers and into my socks.
( ,
Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:14,
archived)

briefs=chag
boxers= shitty socks
I'm going to have to think of a new word
( ,
Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:17,
archived)
boxers= shitty socks
I'm going to have to think of a new word

I want to kill it with sticks and single-band mobile radiation.
( ,
Mon 9 Feb 2009, 10:44,
archived)

in other news, did anyone catch the Daily Mail's story on the death threats made at Jonathan Ross?
And have you seen how that story doesn't exist now?
www.google.co.uk/search?sourceid=navclient&aq=t&hl=en-GB&ie=UTF-8&rlz=1T4GGIH_en-GBGB246GB246&q=Jonathan+ross+death+threat
The question is, did the Daily Mail realise it was probably one of their readers, or was the comments on the article just filled up with red faced, vitriolic conservatives shouting "good"?
( ,
Mon 9 Feb 2009, 10:46,
archived)
And have you seen how that story doesn't exist now?
www.google.co.uk/search?sourceid=navclient&aq=t&hl=en-GB&ie=UTF-8&rlz=1T4GGIH_en-GBGB246GB246&q=Jonathan+ross+death+threat
The question is, did the Daily Mail realise it was probably one of their readers, or was the comments on the article just filled up with red faced, vitriolic conservatives shouting "good"?

Sickipedia got FP on the Star's site over the weekend.
( ,
Mon 9 Feb 2009, 10:48,
archived)

If they'd done that to my grandad I would have messed them up good.
( ,
Mon 9 Feb 2009, 10:54,
archived)

as poor little innocent victim where in actualy fact she's a burlesque dancer.
( ,
Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:04,
archived)

They deserve no privacy because they wear MAKE-UP and CORSETS!
Is that what you meant?
( ,
Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:14,
archived)
Is that what you meant?

Olivia, fetch the smelling-salts; grandmama has taken a turn.
( ,
Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:17,
archived)

She could be a hooker - doesn't make it acceptable for them to wind up her granddad about her sex life.
( ,
Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:15,
archived)

I said the media was trying to enrage puritan Britons that this poor delicate blossom had be violated by a nafarious rogue. As if she swooned from her chair whilst doing her tatting when she head the news.
( ,
Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:34,
archived)

By two men in their 30s and 40s - ie - fully grown adults - containing explicit references to said grandfather's granddaughter's sex life - is seen as pretty out of order.
( ,
Mon 9 Feb 2009, 11:54,
archived)