b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 9249469 (Thread)

# I still don't get that poster (the original), did the Daily Mail make it?
why is his groin so high up?!
(, Sun 8 Mar 2009, 18:14, archived)
# I have no idea :)
(, Sun 8 Mar 2009, 18:14, archived)
# Look upon my works ye mighty, and dis pair
(, Sun 8 Mar 2009, 18:15, archived)
# look upon my......
and repair with the clone tool ;)
(, Sun 8 Mar 2009, 18:52, archived)
# Don't ya know?
Everything that appears in The Daily Mail gets nicked and appears here!
(, Sun 8 Mar 2009, 18:35, archived)
# speaking of the mail
their review of the film is beatifully teeth gnashing and outraged, and includes a complaint about a scene that is neither in the book nor fim
www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/reviews/article-1159801/Watchmen-Superheroes-sick-slick.html
"This despicable trash will find an audience among sad sociopaths, deranged pseudo-intellectuals and brutalised, immature men of all ages."
(, Sun 8 Mar 2009, 18:47, archived)
# Which scene is that?
I refuse to read the daily mail :)
(, Sun 8 Mar 2009, 18:54, archived)
#
"a six-year-old girl is torn apart by dogs."

it does happen in the plot in all fairness, but they heavily imply that you see it on film, which you do not (i am told, i've not actually watched it yet myself)
edit: actually it doesn't happen in the plot either does it? the remians are disposed by being fed to the dogs, which is a different thing.
(, Sun 8 Mar 2009, 18:59, archived)
# Fucking morons!
(, Sun 8 Mar 2009, 19:10, archived)
# "...and a six-year-old girl is torn apart by dogs."
Cunting Daily Fail...
(, Sun 8 Mar 2009, 18:59, archived)
# "set in a world where crime-fighting superheroes have been outlawed"
Unoriginal? It fucking invented that idea!
(, Sun 8 Mar 2009, 18:55, archived)
# that's a bit odd that review
but no less than I'd expect from them. tell people how bad something is without actually describing the thing in question
(, Sun 8 Mar 2009, 18:56, archived)
# yes. a bit a bone
with a shoe on it. BAN THIS SICK FILTH NOW. has the reviewer even see the film??
(, Sun 8 Mar 2009, 19:19, archived)
# possibly only half
their review of "the dark knight" whs a similiar trip down what-the-fuckery road.
(, Sun 8 Mar 2009, 19:28, archived)