zoink!
those are amazing and utterly ridulous all at the same time!
( ,
Wed 1 Apr 2009, 11:17,
archived)
while this outwardly looks like an awesome idea
my shoes tend to last about three months tops. six if they're doc martens
but after they break i could use the technology to build a robot which goes to the corner shop and buys me beer. perhaps it's a good idea after all
( ,
Wed 1 Apr 2009, 11:19,
archived)
but after they break i could use the technology to build a robot which goes to the corner shop and buys me beer. perhaps it's a good idea after all
It's funny because I saw them reported in The Sun...
I wonder if they realise what day it is....?
( ,
Wed 1 Apr 2009, 11:26,
archived)
just as a side note.....
How do you keep your quality but make the file size so small? Im on PShop and save as a small 40kb ish file and it always looks shite.
( ,
Wed 1 Apr 2009, 11:23,
archived)
I use photoshops save for the web feature
www.elated.com/articles/the-save-for-web-feature/
PShop (are you talking about Paintshop Pro?)
Export - Jepg Optimizer
which has several settings you can change to make it Web friendly. (Web safe Palette)
and compression to make the image smaller
( ,
Wed 1 Apr 2009, 11:28,
archived)
PShop (are you talking about Paintshop Pro?)
Export - Jepg Optimizer
which has several settings you can change to make it Web friendly. (Web safe Palette)
and compression to make the image smaller
then save for web is your friend
File/Save for Web / usually jpeg medium
and it should tell you the file size at the bottom left :)
/not got cs4 yet, but it should be the same as 3
( ,
Wed 1 Apr 2009, 11:41,
archived)
File/Save for Web / usually jpeg medium
and it should tell you the file size at the bottom left :)
/not got cs4 yet, but it should be the same as 3
I don't know the technicalities, but it seems to me that...
The two commonest ways to compress an image are:
- downsample: ie. reduce number of pixels;
- more lossy: ie. reduce JPEG quality.
I'm amazed at how good JPEG compression is, even at its worst setting. If you reduce the pixel count and use a moderate JPEG compression it will look rough, whereas keeping a high pixel count and using extreme JPEG compression seems to do a better job.
I just use "Resize Image" and the "Quality" slider when saving as a .jpg. You can tell I don't have Photoshop...
( ,
Wed 1 Apr 2009, 11:42,
archived)
- downsample: ie. reduce number of pixels;
- more lossy: ie. reduce JPEG quality.
I'm amazed at how good JPEG compression is, even at its worst setting. If you reduce the pixel count and use a moderate JPEG compression it will look rough, whereas keeping a high pixel count and using extreme JPEG compression seems to do a better job.
I just use "Resize Image" and the "Quality" slider when saving as a .jpg. You can tell I don't have Photoshop...