
but rock would not exist if it weren't for the beatles
( ,
Sat 18 Apr 2009, 23:53,
archived)

can I just state that I do not at any point doubt the importance of The Beatles in music. However, the majority of their importance is based on the social implications, not the musical innovation that they supposedly created. If you wanna gaz and have a chat with me about it, I would enjoy that. I love arguing about music :D
( ,
Sun 19 Apr 2009, 0:05,
archived)

also, i am probably not entirely capable of a sustained intelligent debate at this hour and in my current state of mind
perhaps some other time though :D
i was brought up listening to the beatles, so my defence of them is probably mostly a knee-jerk reaction (fun fact: i took my username from 'i am the walrus')
( ,
Sun 19 Apr 2009, 0:19,
archived)
perhaps some other time though :D
i was brought up listening to the beatles, so my defence of them is probably mostly a knee-jerk reaction (fun fact: i took my username from 'i am the walrus')

However, my main point is that they weren't anywhere near as innnovative as people made them out to be. Undoubtedly the biggest band of all time though, and I think the most important band of all time. However, I myself, like Smash, am not a massive fan.
( ,
Sun 19 Apr 2009, 0:23,
archived)

to musical history, but that doesn't make me like them any more. it's like football, as soon as people realise that i'm a scouser, they immediately assume that i love football and the beatles.
( ,
Sat 18 Apr 2009, 23:56,
archived)


unless you mean that you don't like them purely because people expect you to like them
( ,
Sun 19 Apr 2009, 0:01,
archived)

i don't like either of them and it annoys me that, due to ridiculous stereotyping, there will always be people dumbfounded by the fact that a scouser would dislike both these things. i'd dislike them anyway.
( ,
Sun 19 Apr 2009, 0:10,
archived)