that's 65% more than I understand about themI just change the numbers slightly in the formulas until the child in me shouts 'pretty!!'
(
PedroHin Come along & ride on a Flantastic Voyage,
Sun 3 May 2009, 3:40,
archived)
also, which one o you wiseguys has been posting to CL Saint Louis personals(
PedroHin Come along & ride on a Flantastic Voyage,
Sun 3 May 2009, 3:43,
archived)
ah so the one in the middle is f(z)= z^2+c1the others might be f(z)= z^3+c2 etc...
(,
Sun 3 May 2009, 3:52,
archived)
i dont know what this means, but the one I used wasmandel
z(0) = c = pixel;
z(n+1) = z(n)^2 + c.
Two parameters: real & imaginary perturbations of z(0)
...and all I did was change the 'real' from 0 to 1, then 2, then 3...
(z(0) = c = pixel;
z(n+1) = z(n)^2 + c.
Two parameters: real & imaginary perturbations of z(0)
...and all I did was change the 'real' from 0 to 1, then 2, then 3...
PedroHin Come along & ride on a Flantastic Voyage,
Sun 3 May 2009, 3:59,
archived)
ah and then the plot is shaded by the number of iterations it takes for a pointto piss off to infinity? I think I understand what's happening now...
This sortof thing is what happens when you fiddle with the power of z:
( that's f(z)=z^pi+c )
(,
Sun 3 May 2009, 4:09,
archived)
This sortof thing is what happens when you fiddle with the power of z:
( that's f(z)=z^pi+c )
NEVER FIDDLE WITH THE POWER OF ZZ takes a dim view on such behaviours.
(
arrangedletters,
Sun 3 May 2009, 4:16,
archived)
A masterful pun.Well done, not too tough, nice and tender.
(
I smash things in my sleep uruk-hai ...and I'll look low. Now where'd they go?,
Sun 3 May 2009, 5:47,
archived)
a perfect buttox sequence :P
( PedroHin Come along & ride on a Flantastic Voyage,
Sun 3 May 2009, 4:22,
archived)
This is a vortex
It's generated by the equation governing a mexican who needs to shit
oh...... i thought he was pacing in his cell.
(
atomic A-bomb-a-nation,
Sun 3 May 2009, 4:28,
archived)