KICKIN' IT OLD SCHOOL!NOW SLOWER
(
PedroHin Come along & ride on a Flantastic Voyage,
Sun 3 May 2009, 3:19,
archived)
OH YEAH!Make that gingerbread man work it!
(
Tahkcalb ω∞ for sigs,
Sun 3 May 2009, 3:22,
archived)
so the thing in the middle is the madelbrot setso what is the rest of it?
(,
Sun 3 May 2009, 3:30,
archived)
Stuff that is not, colour tells you how soon it was rejected, part of the set.Shitty explanation, but that's the sort of the idea. Number of steps it took to go away into infinity.
There are other features and methods to catalog a point; orbits, wells, and the like. I only get
or understand about 70% of what is actually going on with those kind of fractals.
(There are other features and methods to catalog a point; orbits, wells, and the like. I only get
or understand about 70% of what is actually going on with those kind of fractals.
Tahkcalb ω∞ for sigs,
Sun 3 May 2009, 3:37,
archived)
that's 65% more than I understand about themI just change the numbers slightly in the formulas until the child in me shouts 'pretty!!'
( PedroHin Come along & ride on a Flantastic Voyage,
Sun 3 May 2009, 3:40,
archived)
also, which one o you wiseguys has been posting to CL Saint Louis personals(
PedroHin Come along & ride on a Flantastic Voyage,
Sun 3 May 2009, 3:43,
archived)
ah so the one in the middle is f(z)= z^2+c1the others might be f(z)= z^3+c2 etc...
(,
Sun 3 May 2009, 3:52,
archived)
i dont know what this means, but the one I used wasmandel
z(0) = c = pixel;
z(n+1) = z(n)^2 + c.
Two parameters: real & imaginary perturbations of z(0)
...and all I did was change the 'real' from 0 to 1, then 2, then 3...
(z(0) = c = pixel;
z(n+1) = z(n)^2 + c.
Two parameters: real & imaginary perturbations of z(0)
...and all I did was change the 'real' from 0 to 1, then 2, then 3...
PedroHin Come along & ride on a Flantastic Voyage,
Sun 3 May 2009, 3:59,
archived)
ah and then the plot is shaded by the number of iterations it takes for a pointto piss off to infinity? I think I understand what's happening now...
This sortof thing is what happens when you fiddle with the power of z:
( that's f(z)=z^pi+c )
(,
Sun 3 May 2009, 4:09,
archived)
This sortof thing is what happens when you fiddle with the power of z:
( that's f(z)=z^pi+c )
NEVER FIDDLE WITH THE POWER OF ZZ takes a dim view on such behaviours.
(
arrangedletters,
Sun 3 May 2009, 4:16,
archived)
A masterful pun.Well done, not too tough, nice and tender.
(
I smash things in my sleep uruk-hai ...and I'll look low. Now where'd they go?,
Sun 3 May 2009, 5:47,
archived)
a perfect buttox sequence :P
( PedroHin Come along & ride on a Flantastic Voyage,
Sun 3 May 2009, 4:22,
archived)
This is a vortex
It's generated by the equation governing a mexican who needs to shit
oh...... i thought he was pacing in his cell.
(
atomic A-bomb-a-nation,
Sun 3 May 2009, 4:28,
archived)
short explanation: it makes all kinds of wiggly patternslong explanation: it makes all kinds of wiggly patterns using sums
(
discomeats This canoe,
Sun 3 May 2009, 3:41,
archived)
I'm confused as to what the other frames are.I kinda know a little bit about the generation of the fractal, but I don't understand what's going on with the map after the main features of the Mandelbrot set are apparent
(,
Sun 3 May 2009, 3:43,
archived)
Key point on Mandelbrot's set is the interior area......is infinite. All the other settings don't exhibit this. Although
Julia sets of near-by settings may do so. There may actually be
a real limit to the interior, as topographically there must be.
As to how far down the calculation that limit is--has been the
hard bit for the real math wanks. It's sort of like a mobius
strip in 2(plus some fraction)D. Or so Mandelbrot says.
edit: Not what you were on asking, as I see above, oops. [/;-)
(Julia sets of near-by settings may do so. There may actually be
a real limit to the interior, as topographically there must be.
As to how far down the calculation that limit is--has been the
hard bit for the real math wanks. It's sort of like a mobius
strip in 2(plus some fraction)D. Or so Mandelbrot says.
edit: Not what you were on asking, as I see above, oops. [/;-)
Tahkcalb ω∞ for sigs,
Sun 3 May 2009, 3:58,
archived)
this hurts my head.I like the idea of 'I wanked the numbers in the iteration formula until i got something pretty'
(,
Sun 3 May 2009, 4:04,
archived)
His run walks to the near-by areas. If we zoomed in on those...we'd likely find that the set does resolve to continuous flat result between
any given feature points*. At least, that is what should happen. But that's
where my head starts to hurt. Mainly in how one can anticipate this from
the stated formula. Madness in jars and buckets if you ask me.
* except at the Mandelbrot set point.
(any given feature points*. At least, that is what should happen. But that's
where my head starts to hurt. Mainly in how one can anticipate this from
the stated formula. Madness in jars and buckets if you ask me.
* except at the Mandelbrot set point.
Tahkcalb ω∞ for sigs,
Sun 3 May 2009, 4:14,
archived)
all i have gathered from this is that infinity is blue.
gronkpan @vomitinglarry.bsky.social,
Sun 3 May 2009, 5:06,
archived)
Infinite, not infinity as such.Also
one should be careful to note that it is infinite within
the bounds that have been set to check or test for.
The rest, other colours, already went to infinity.
(one should be careful to note that it is infinite within
the bounds that have been set to check or test for.
The rest, other colours, already went to infinity.
Tahkcalb ω∞ for sigs,
Sun 3 May 2009, 5:26,
archived)
I have thatTattooed on my shoulder, the manderbrolt set that is...
(
jakedamusss I understand, and dont care.,
Sun 3 May 2009, 8:30,
archived)
I like it fast and weird
I smash things in my sleep uruk-hai ...and I'll look low. Now where'd they go?,
Sun 3 May 2009, 5:44,
archived)
Dear God, that is FANTASTIC!!!It has a strange hypnotic effect...
(
Shazzoir Old enough to know better young enough not to care,
Sun 3 May 2009, 9:26,
archived)