
not impressed, bu the adaptation or the 3d ness.
Hat off to the animators, but it wasn't a patch on Nightmare as a whole.
( ,
Mon 4 May 2009, 17:27,
archived)
Hat off to the animators, but it wasn't a patch on Nightmare as a whole.

but it does have a 'generic cgi' look about it. But that's from the poster....
( ,
Mon 4 May 2009, 17:28,
archived)

But ta for the tip.
( ,
Mon 4 May 2009, 17:30,
archived)

Will have to go and see it
( ,
Mon 4 May 2009, 17:30,
archived)


and the 3d processing makes a lot of it look fuzzy and even more jittery
( ,
Mon 4 May 2009, 17:36,
archived)

It looks smoother then your normal stop motion
( ,
Mon 4 May 2009, 17:38,
archived)

couldn't advise either way really
( ,
Mon 4 May 2009, 17:39,
archived)

in Leicester Square. It looked stunnning!
( ,
Mon 4 May 2009, 17:40,
archived)

but I don't hold out huge hopes
( ,
Mon 4 May 2009, 17:29,
archived)


because its a much longer story with extra characters and big fancy setpieces.
Its a good example of animation skills, but the story was just a bit "meh" and 3d glasses just emphasised a bit of steam or the depth of a table - gimmicky and in no way a part of the story.
( ,
Mon 4 May 2009, 17:38,
archived)
Its a good example of animation skills, but the story was just a bit "meh" and 3d glasses just emphasised a bit of steam or the depth of a table - gimmicky and in no way a part of the story.

this utube stop motion hurts my head thinking of the number of frames required
( ,
Mon 4 May 2009, 17:47,
archived)