not impressed, bu the adaptation or the 3d ness.
Hat off to the animators, but it wasn't a patch on Nightmare as a whole.
(,
Mon 4 May 2009, 17:27,
archived)
Hat off to the animators, but it wasn't a patch on Nightmare as a whole.
but it does have a 'generic cgi' look about it. But that's from the poster....
(,
Mon 4 May 2009, 17:28,
archived)
But ta for the tip.
(,
Mon 4 May 2009, 17:30,
archived)
Will have to go and see it
(,
Mon 4 May 2009, 17:30,
archived)
and the 3d processing makes a lot of it look fuzzy and even more jittery
(,
Mon 4 May 2009, 17:36,
archived)
It looks smoother then your normal stop motion
(,
Mon 4 May 2009, 17:38,
archived)
couldn't advise either way really
(,
Mon 4 May 2009, 17:39,
archived)
in Leicester Square. It looked stunnning!
(,
Mon 4 May 2009, 17:40,
archived)
but I don't hold out huge hopes
(,
Mon 4 May 2009, 17:29,
archived)
because its a much longer story with extra characters and big fancy setpieces.
Its a good example of animation skills, but the story was just a bit "meh" and 3d glasses just emphasised a bit of steam or the depth of a table - gimmicky and in no way a part of the story.
(,
Mon 4 May 2009, 17:38,
archived)
Its a good example of animation skills, but the story was just a bit "meh" and 3d glasses just emphasised a bit of steam or the depth of a table - gimmicky and in no way a part of the story.
this utube stop motion hurts my head thinking of the number of frames required
(,
Mon 4 May 2009, 17:47,
archived)