I thought the point was it was still called 'Finding Nemo', just done as the Jaws gob underneath the swimmer type thing.
(,
Thu 16 Jul 2009, 11:46,
archived)
i misread the instruction as including mashup the title.
(,
Thu 16 Jul 2009, 11:51,
archived)
now I feel like a cunt.
has anyone got a spare one?
(,
Thu 16 Jul 2009, 11:52,
archived)
has anyone got a spare one?
I'm not adverse to the guidelines being bent as long as
a) some effort's gone into it
b) it's amusing
and
c) they don't pea in a new post
Two out of three aint bad
I'd rather things like this than just changing the name on a poster, which I fear will happen a lot, but its within the guidelines of the compo
(,
Thu 16 Jul 2009, 11:52,
archived)
a) some effort's gone into it
b) it's amusing
and
c) they don't pea in a new post
Two out of three aint bad
I'd rather things like this than just changing the name on a poster, which I fear will happen a lot, but its within the guidelines of the compo
the actual shop job is rather well done, and I have failed to mention this in my mouth-frothing lust to correct minor perceived errors.
I shall correct this posthaste.
(,
Thu 16 Jul 2009, 11:55,
archived)
I shall correct this posthaste.
and to be fair, the word "mashup" in the title of the challenge is a little misleading. I know people should read the whole thing, but none of us are here because we have long attention spans, are we!
(,
Thu 16 Jul 2009, 11:55,
archived)
so it encourages the peas
(,
Thu 16 Jul 2009, 11:58,
archived)
but any movie poster challenge is going to do that.
I am being unusually sanguine today, I must have swine flu or something.
(,
Thu 16 Jul 2009, 12:01,
archived)
I am being unusually sanguine today, I must have swine flu or something.