
Everyone "aquires" it.
( ,
Wed 4 Nov 2009, 17:41,
archived)

wouldn't acquire it if they didn't charge £500 for it?
( ,
Wed 4 Nov 2009, 17:43,
archived)

because then I would be a hypocritic cnut to expect anyone to pay for the programs I help make. And certainly couldn't expect anyone like Nuts or Zoo to pay me for a picture I'd made using the software
( ,
Wed 4 Nov 2009, 17:43,
archived)


I found it far too confusing. paint.net does everything I need for nowt.
( ,
Wed 4 Nov 2009, 17:49,
archived)

perhaps if the people who didn't need to use Photoshop didn't pirate it then the price would come down for those of us who do. :(
( ,
Wed 4 Nov 2009, 17:49,
archived)

But that's terrible for animation in my experience.
( ,
Wed 4 Nov 2009, 17:51,
archived)

Surely you'd still have the same number of legitimate users.
( ,
Wed 4 Nov 2009, 17:55,
archived)

I guess its just my own jealousy of people who haven't paid for it using a newer version than I can afford!
( ,
Wed 4 Nov 2009, 17:58,
archived)

get yourself a copy, make some pics - sell them and once you have made enough money, buy a licence.
:D
( ,
Wed 4 Nov 2009, 17:59,
archived)
:D

but I don't sell enough pics to afford the upgrade
( ,
Wed 4 Nov 2009, 18:01,
archived)