Hang on a minute though£3 is not less than half of £5.39 and therefore not better for the consumer wishing to save monies...they are doing it wrong. Manager must be special.
(
awsm! namaste bitches,
Tue 5 Jan 2010, 11:16,
archived)
£3 is better than half of £5.39better for them anyway.
(
Barbarossa is not my real name,
Tue 5 Jan 2010, 11:19,
archived)
I wasn't clear,I meant the manager is special.
(
daddyswank came out the closet on,
Tue 5 Jan 2010, 11:30,
archived)
Half of £5.39Would be £2.695
Which is a NONSENSE.
Clearly £3.00 is Better, both aesthetically and calculatorability-wise
(Which is a NONSENSE.
Clearly £3.00 is Better, both aesthetically and calculatorability-wise
The Mighty Gusset Doesn't Care - And Doesn't Care Who Knows It !,
Tue 5 Jan 2010, 11:37,
archived)
LolThis makes me warm inside...ahhh
( daddyswank came out the closet on,
Tue 5 Jan 2010, 11:52,
archived)
They mislabled the tuna offer from last month, three pack was £2 but two of them was £3 which was 6 for £3 (50p a can instead of £1+ hence better than half price). Money off AND a discount for bulk but this label seems to have conflated the two offers (past and current) and ended up incomprehensible.
(,
Wed 6 Jan 2010, 21:41,
archived)