Well yes, I thought it was stunning. Saw it a couple of weeks ago in normal 3D and caught the IMAX version last night. Totally pwns the format! However I can now foresee a whole raft of really low-rent 3D efforts cashing in on it.
(barryheadwoundMul-ti-pass? Multipass!,
Wed 13 Jan 2010, 13:04,
archived)
And I thought it was better than "LOOK AT THIS! IT'S COMING STRAIGHT AT YOU TO MILK 3D VISUAL EFFECTS"
(xihpeteA neutrino walks straight through a bar, with v>c.,
Wed 13 Jan 2010, 14:39,
archived)
Oh now that is excellent!
I still don't know whether I want to see Avatar or not. But tonight I'm orf to see Sherlock Holmes so at least I don't have to make that decision today.
(wuffle, the b3ta bunny's flea collar isn't working on,
Wed 13 Jan 2010, 13:14,
archived)
It was a fun film, just "FernGully ... IN SPAAAACCE".
3D glasses gave us all headaches, though.
(The Alchemistking of the needlessly complicated,
Wed 13 Jan 2010, 13:16,
archived)
I thought of it as Smurfahontas
Was good though, and as for Zoe Saldana in Na'avi form... yummy. :-)