Very basically
The Government, the executive 'think' and formulate policy which Parliament (the legislature) vote on.
The Civil Service then 'do' and put these policies in action.
It's a lot murkier than that though, and I haven't even mentioned the Lords.
When one Government gets kicked out they will bring in a team of advisers etc but it's not like a big office move - most people i.e the civil service stay where they are.
( ,
Fri 5 Mar 2010, 14:35,
archived)
The Civil Service then 'do' and put these policies in action.
It's a lot murkier than that though, and I haven't even mentioned the Lords.
When one Government gets kicked out they will bring in a team of advisers etc but it's not like a big office move - most people i.e the civil service stay where they are.
I just can't believe anyone can expect any new party to make changes to such a deep rooted system
You would never build a new house on fucked foundations, yet every single time....
( ,
Fri 5 Mar 2010, 14:39,
archived)
The 'fucked foundations' part is spot on ...
Most governments (world-wide) don't have the balls to make radical changes.
Look at how Obama is getting butt-fucked over MediCare etc.
( ,
Fri 5 Mar 2010, 14:42,
archived)
Look at how Obama is getting butt-fucked over MediCare etc.
Although there is an element of similarity,
the system in America works very differently from ours doesn't it?
( ,
Fri 5 Mar 2010, 14:48,
archived)
Aye, very much 'interest' lead
Lots of money greasing the wheels of power. The President actually has very little power without support from the
2 legislatures there - he can make war without their initial support though.
( ,
Fri 5 Mar 2010, 15:10,
archived)
2 legislatures there - he can make war without their initial support though.