![Challenge Entry: Superheroes in History [challenge entry]](/images/board_posticon_c.gif)

From the Superheroes in History challenge. See all 302 entries (closed)
( , Fri 5 Mar 2010, 14:20, archived)

How apt when I just read this:
news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/8551528.stm
( ,
Fri 5 Mar 2010, 14:24,
archived)
news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/8551528.stm

I actually had to double check I had posted the correct link :)
( ,
Fri 5 Mar 2010, 14:29,
archived)

*smashes pens against the wall*
www.youtube.com/watch?v=4f3d5ZdE4vY
( ,
Fri 5 Mar 2010, 14:30,
archived)
www.youtube.com/watch?v=4f3d5ZdE4vY

I merely thought that covered up nudey sculptures was a similarity on this occasion
;)
( ,
Fri 5 Mar 2010, 14:33,
archived)
;)

Anyway, who cares. It gave me an excuse to post some television :D
www.youtube.com/watch?v=jlbunmCbTBA&feature=related
( ,
Fri 5 Mar 2010, 14:35,
archived)
www.youtube.com/watch?v=jlbunmCbTBA&feature=related

And I did an actual lol at the vitriolic capitalisation of "YOU IDIOT"!
:D
( ,
Fri 5 Mar 2010, 14:36,
archived)
:D

Marguee Moon and Television albums are well worth buying.
( ,
Fri 5 Mar 2010, 14:42,
archived)

Carrying on from Tom's standing for parliament, anyone want to explain the tiers of power?
It's always puzzled me how the change over of parties actually happens. You couldn't empty Microsoft out of an office and completely replace it with Adobe staff who've never sat at the desks or know where the coffee machine is and expect it to carry on with Windows tech support and developing Operating Systems.
So how do people think changing political parties changes the actual running of the country which is clearly being taken care of by someone else.
It's something I've never really put much thought in to or asked for fear of looking stupid and it not really being anything I can change. but it's friday, what the heck, I'll look stupid.
( ,
Fri 5 Mar 2010, 14:27,
archived)
It's always puzzled me how the change over of parties actually happens. You couldn't empty Microsoft out of an office and completely replace it with Adobe staff who've never sat at the desks or know where the coffee machine is and expect it to carry on with Windows tech support and developing Operating Systems.
So how do people think changing political parties changes the actual running of the country which is clearly being taken care of by someone else.
It's something I've never really put much thought in to or asked for fear of looking stupid and it not really being anything I can change. but it's friday, what the heck, I'll look stupid.

but I believe that what it is is that the politicians are just policy makers, and they essentially dictate what Civil servants do isn't it?
( ,
Fri 5 Mar 2010, 14:33,
archived)

so they can get their brain-addled schemes on the statute books
( ,
Fri 5 Mar 2010, 14:34,
archived)

do they have like a teacher training day?
( ,
Fri 5 Mar 2010, 14:36,
archived)

( ,
Fri 5 Mar 2010, 14:40,
archived)

"Do your best to not fuck this shit up you bunch of shitcunts!" published by the Department for Cunts and Warthogs, available fior download at www.shitcunts.gov.uk/suckonthisfucknugget.php
Or something like that ;)
( ,
Fri 5 Mar 2010, 14:41,
archived)
Or something like that ;)

Watch Yes, Minsiter. It's all there.
It got me my politics A Level
( ,
Fri 5 Mar 2010, 14:51,
archived)
It got me my politics A Level

The Government, the executive 'think' and formulate policy which Parliament (the legislature) vote on.
The Civil Service then 'do' and put these policies in action.
It's a lot murkier than that though, and I haven't even mentioned the Lords.
When one Government gets kicked out they will bring in a team of advisers etc but it's not like a big office move - most people i.e the civil service stay where they are.
( ,
Fri 5 Mar 2010, 14:35,
archived)
The Civil Service then 'do' and put these policies in action.
It's a lot murkier than that though, and I haven't even mentioned the Lords.
When one Government gets kicked out they will bring in a team of advisers etc but it's not like a big office move - most people i.e the civil service stay where they are.

You would never build a new house on fucked foundations, yet every single time....
( ,
Fri 5 Mar 2010, 14:39,
archived)

Most governments (world-wide) don't have the balls to make radical changes.
Look at how Obama is getting butt-fucked over MediCare etc.
( ,
Fri 5 Mar 2010, 14:42,
archived)
Look at how Obama is getting butt-fucked over MediCare etc.

the system in America works very differently from ours doesn't it?
( ,
Fri 5 Mar 2010, 14:48,
archived)

Lots of money greasing the wheels of power. The President actually has very little power without support from the
2 legislatures there - he can make war without their initial support though.
( ,
Fri 5 Mar 2010, 15:10,
archived)
2 legislatures there - he can make war without their initial support though.

and continue to fuck everything up for us cos his mates have asked him to
( ,
Fri 5 Mar 2010, 14:41,
archived)

it sort of answers this, and is excellent and worth watching anyway.
relevant bit: www.youtube.com/watch?v=2oOW_TNJqnQ
( ,
Fri 5 Mar 2010, 14:36,
archived)
relevant bit: www.youtube.com/watch?v=2oOW_TNJqnQ

the party in power comes in with ideas that are then turned into plans with schedules. there may even be targets. they will bring in a few cronies from industry or university dorm-room days to put a bit of stick about. but the same civil servants then get told they have to implement the vision and come up with feasibility studies, budgets, review periods and success criteria.
it's a little bit like NCOs and other ranks in the forces - the bedrock of the executive - vs. commissioned officers, the temporary direction-givers.
oh and I just made all that up out of whole cloth.
( ,
Fri 5 Mar 2010, 14:40,
archived)
it's a little bit like NCOs and other ranks in the forces - the bedrock of the executive - vs. commissioned officers, the temporary direction-givers.
oh and I just made all that up out of whole cloth.