Whoa there
www.b3ta.com/board/7898522
Cubism 101 begins here:
www.b3ta.com/board/7898418
( ,
Fri 19 Mar 2010, 21:59,
archived)
Cubism 101 begins here:
www.b3ta.com/board/7898418
It /might/ be cubism.
edit: Hah. Count on _Felix to elevate the discussion to philosophy :)
(Of course, you are all imaginary people, by the way, I hope that you know this...)
( ,
Fri 19 Mar 2010, 22:01,
archived)
(Of course, you are all imaginary people, by the way, I hope that you know this...)
Although having said that, this sentence (attributed to David Deutsch):
"David Deutsch says that flowers are beautiful because they communicate accross a genetic gap,"
Is such astonishing bullshit, that I can't even begin to explain how stupid it is.
( ,
Fri 19 Mar 2010, 22:10,
archived)
Is such astonishing bullshit, that I can't even begin to explain how stupid it is.
I think I remember that thread
pages and pages of art school argument over what cubism is.
Possibly the most highbrow discussion I've ever witnessed on /board
( ,
Fri 19 Mar 2010, 22:04,
archived)
Possibly the most highbrow discussion I've ever witnessed on /board
Haha from where I was sitting
it looked more like a casual tourist falling into a shark pool.
( ,
Fri 19 Mar 2010, 22:10,
archived)
Also, someone in that thread was pimping his nodes...
node pimp!
( ,
Fri 19 Mar 2010, 22:14,
archived)
Boo :(
I've discussed about whether Lagrangians are covariant or not, the physicality of a non-covariant Lagrangian (of course it has one; if it didn't the whole of effective field theory would be pretty suspect), and something of the inner workings of acoustic black holes. I thought that was pretty highbrow.
Then again, you probably didn't see it.
( ,
Fri 19 Mar 2010, 22:15,
archived)
Then again, you probably didn't see it.
I can't say it's stuck in my mind
so you're probably right. I didn't see it.
( ,
Fri 19 Mar 2010, 22:20,
archived)
I was involved in a two-person economics pun thread once.
I think I win.
( ,
Fri 19 Mar 2010, 22:29,
archived)
That is pretty superior. Chemistry discussions would probably be pretty boring.
Although there was a documentary on last night about chemistry where I learned about the first guy to draw a chemical bond as a line on a page (he was Scottish!).
( ,
Fri 19 Mar 2010, 22:32,
archived)
Mine wasn't a chemistry discussion!
:( Mine was about quantum physics and field theories and condensed matter and, specifically, acoustic black holes which are exactly what they say, black holes for sound.
I'm going to go and sulk* now.
* Sleep, I get up in six hours to go to an airport. I love** flying.
** Fucking loathe
Edit: Also I actually agree, chemistry discussions *would* be pretty dull. Then again, so would theoretical physics ones, I guess, so I'm actually no better than you. I really am going to bed now.
( ,
Fri 19 Mar 2010, 22:51,
archived)
I'm going to go and sulk* now.
* Sleep, I get up in six hours to go to an airport. I love** flying.
** Fucking loathe
Edit: Also I actually agree, chemistry discussions *would* be pretty dull. Then again, so would theoretical physics ones, I guess, so I'm actually no better than you. I really am going to bed now.
That second one is a rather hefty thread haha!
I scanned over it really fast, love how it starts with talk of cubism/coconut crabs and bounty bars only to end at "beano art".
( ,
Fri 19 Mar 2010, 22:08,
archived)