b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 9996303 (Thread)

# I once dated a girl with strabismus
Lovely girl, but no 3D vision.

Have a 3D pic.
(, Thu 8 Apr 2010, 13:24, archived)
# She'd have loved Clash of the Titans
the 3D version is rubbish... oh wait it wasn't just the 3D...
(, Thu 8 Apr 2010, 13:27, archived)
# Is it? I know the 3d was an awful tacked-on affair
but I had high hopes for the film itself
(, Thu 8 Apr 2010, 13:31, archived)
# I've only seen the 2D version of Alice in Wonderland
Apparently the 3D version isn't as good.
(, Thu 8 Apr 2010, 13:34, archived)
# No the film is a big let down
the original still stands as the better of the two - there is a small nod to the original with the mechanical owl which plays a very brief cameo. The 3D in of itself is good but the film doesn't make proper use of the technology as there is a lot of fast action sequences that just look dark and blurry in 3D and it's very hard to focus on what's going on - also because of the scale of the monsters the 3D doesn't work as it's clipped by the boundaries of the screen and the effect works much better when the 3D elements are within the boundaries thereby appearing to come out of the screen.

The movie is a 'meh!' update probably better seen in 2D
(, Thu 8 Apr 2010, 13:39, archived)
# So, it's not proper 3-D?
Explain? Is it like a series of cardboard cutouts stood at different distances to each other?
(, Thu 8 Apr 2010, 13:54, archived)
# And the cinema staff run up and down the aisles with the cutouts
(, Thu 8 Apr 2010, 13:56, archived)
# Actually when you watch it it's not far from looking exactly like cardboard cutouts with a Depth of Field effect
(, Thu 8 Apr 2010, 14:02, archived)
# They filmed it with 2d cameras
then added the 3d in post, when avatar did well.
(, Thu 8 Apr 2010, 14:07, archived)
# That would explain why it's so hit and miss - mostly miss
looks like I chose the wrong film for my first look at the new 3D.
(, Thu 8 Apr 2010, 14:09, archived)
# Oh, bums.
(, Thu 8 Apr 2010, 14:09, archived)
# Oh that's fucking shit.
I was thinking about going to see it in 3D, as my first experience of the new 3D... I don't think I'll bother now.
(, Thu 8 Apr 2010, 14:13, archived)
# Yes I made that mistake
it probably better watching in 2D
(, Thu 8 Apr 2010, 14:16, archived)
# I'm even second-thoughting that
I might just watch the original again. I'll download it from torrents. FUCK YOU DIGITAL ECONOMY BILL!
(, Thu 8 Apr 2010, 14:17, archived)
# That'd be so awkward.
You'd never be able to look into her eyes without wondering if she was gazing lovingly at someone just behind you.

It'd work well for love triangles though.
(, Thu 8 Apr 2010, 13:27, archived)
# so if you put on weight
she would just assume you were standing closer?
(, Thu 8 Apr 2010, 13:28, archived)