b3ta.com links
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » links » Link 1080356 | Random (Thread)

This is a normal post What about choice?
As far as the law is concerned, children under sixteen lack competence to make moral decisions for themselves. As such, the responsibility passes to others, who have a duty to act in the child's best medical interests.

Usually, that other is the parent; and it's usually assumed that the parent will act in the child's best interest. But that assumption is rebuttable - in which case, a suboptimal decision can be overruled. That's what happened here.

It's got nothing to do with rights or choice. It's about duties to those in your care.
 (I helped save b3ta! Enzyme is powered by sunlight, Sat 12 Oct 2013, 16:46, Reply)
This is a normal post Rebuttable.
What a wonderful word.
 (I helped save b3ta! jonbob loves you, Sat 12 Oct 2013, 16:47, Reply)
This is a normal post *sings Louis Armstrong*

(I helped save b3ta! Enzyme is powered by sunlight, Sat 12 Oct 2013, 16:48, Reply)
This is a normal post well i for one am glad you cleared that up
now cn you use shorter words so that it makes sense?
or is a that the parent/s coculd have been scummy low lifes not fit to have kids let alone raise them?
 (I helped save b3ta! fluffybunnykiller Is feasting on the clitoris of life, Sat 12 Oct 2013, 16:48, Reply)
This is a normal post I'll make you an offer:
If I promise to explain Enzyme's arguments for you, will you promise to proof read your own?
 (I helped save b3ta! jonbob loves you, Sat 12 Oct 2013, 16:50, Reply)
This is a normal post no
not a chance
nada
niet
etc etc and so on
wouldnt be right if it was all correct
 (I helped save b3ta! fluffybunnykiller Is feasting on the clitoris of life, Sat 12 Oct 2013, 16:53, Reply)
This is a normal post That was the most catty thing I've heard all day.
Bravo.
 (pissflaps. FSPW, Sat 12 Oct 2013, 16:56, Reply)
This is a normal post Meow.
Whatever happened to pedantichrist?
 (I helped save b3ta! jonbob loves you, Sat 12 Oct 2013, 17:02, Reply)
This is a normal post more likely that the parents are new agey or religious folk
who believed the lies the papers printed about MMR all those years ago
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MMR_vaccine_controversy
prior to submitting his paper to The Lancet, Wakefield had received £55,000 from Legal Aid Board solicitors seeking evidence to use against vaccine manufacturers, that several of the parents quoted as saying that MMR had damaged their children were also litigants, and that Wakefield did not inform colleagues or medical authorities of the conflict of interest
 (I helped save b3ta! HappyToast Groat froth, Sat 12 Oct 2013, 16:56, Reply)
This is a normal post By "the papers" do you just mean "The Mail"?
Or did some of the more reputable ones push that crap too?
 (I helped save b3ta! jonbob loves you, Sat 12 Oct 2013, 17:03, Reply)
This is a normal post didn't want to say without evidence and couldn't be arsed to check :D
edit - lmgtfy.com/?q=daily+mail+mmr+autism
 (I helped save b3ta! HappyToast Groat froth, Sat 12 Oct 2013, 17:10, Reply)
This is a normal post I'm going to take that as a yes.

(I helped save b3ta! jonbob loves you, Sat 12 Oct 2013, 17:12, Reply)