(, Sun 12 May 2019, 23:33, Reply)
"Why don't you just say that you're on the left? Is that so hard for you?"
"If you only knew how ridiculous that is you wouldn't have said it."
Ignorant Yank is ignorant. And woefully unprepared and didn't do his research.
(, Mon 13 May 2019, 0:34, Reply)
Twat.
(, Mon 13 May 2019, 1:01, Reply)
inter, meaning between, with connotations of reciprocity
and
view, meaning opinion
Not that that's what this kind of interview is supposed to be.
(, Mon 13 May 2019, 10:22, Reply)
is beyond you.
The picture is very accurate though.
(, Mon 13 May 2019, 10:37, Reply)
now they're all online banding together to prop up guys like this prick
(, Mon 13 May 2019, 1:20, Reply)
A ten-fold increase in fucking moronic motor-mouth cunts like this.
(, Mon 13 May 2019, 9:27, Reply)
Ba dum tish
Edit: phone decided I needed a typo in the title; I shall now commit seppuku
(, Tue 14 May 2019, 1:45, Reply)
but then he's normally set up to debate complete idiots who know nothing. Quite an amusing result when he meets someone with education and intelligence.
(, Mon 13 May 2019, 10:18, Reply)
And decades of experience in handling jumped-up little twats full of their own self importance.
(, Mon 13 May 2019, 11:36, Reply)
but i actually thought he emerged the lesser of two cunts, considering his inexperience. neil was obviously ill-prepared and leant tiresomely on his pedagogic drawl to give his questions more significance than they deserved. shapiro for his part, with a bit of self-discipline, could have used neil’s own lazy swinging to unbalance him. he lost his temper though, and any advantage he might have taken went with it.
a no-score draw.
(, Mon 13 May 2019, 14:29, Reply)
and that’s the issue i have with the media fallout from these erstwhile gladiatorial interviews. just because they’re adversarial, doesn’t make them debates. neil may be a successful media man, but i’m not convinced he’s clever enough to debate. shapiro is clever, but he’s fighting a steep uphill battle outside his alt-right echo chamber, and his nasal timbre and petulant expression don’t help his cause. He is entitled to his shitty opinions however, and it’s unfortunate that neil neither respected that nor asked questions that exposed their fallacy.
(, Mon 13 May 2019, 22:14, Reply)
Neil simply quoted Shaprio's own words, and he was unable to explain himself or justify what he wrote. Shapiro came across as an intellectual lightweight. He looked like he was expecting to get a softball opportunity to spout some soundbites and simply couldn't cope when someone challenged him. Neil wasn't even pushing him very hard!
(, Mon 13 May 2019, 22:46, Reply)
that does seem to be the consensus, but shallow analysis is anathema to constructive debate, don't you think?
and by 'you', i'm obviously referring to your main account, not your sock
(, Tue 14 May 2019, 0:28, Reply)
