For me the sparks flying off when the snowspeeder gets hit look worse, but it's fine. Really.
(
evil_andy Stick stick stick stick sticky sticky stick stick, Sun 27 Sep 2020, 16:55,
Reply)
that shot never looked good when it was first released, surprised it wasn't cut
but I think it's fine too, I don't think you're supposed to look at special effects too closely, including the ones in modern films, short cuts and stock particle effects etc. aren't difficult to spot
a few of my favourite films have "early CG" that wouldn't be considered good enough for a modern film, even though it was state-of-the-art at the time, but it doesn't matter because everything else is great
(
custard, Sun 27 Sep 2020, 17:37,
Reply)
Talos coming to life is still fantastic, and that’s from 1963
Helped by brilliantly horrible sound effects as well.
youtu.be/SNg4KZKG96o
(
Thrill_My_Chinchilla is old and unimproved, Sun 27 Sep 2020, 19:00,
Reply)
It has charm and style but not realism.
It looked shonky by the 80s when I first saw it as a child. ESB's tauntauns only look slightly better.
The Harryhausen low frame rate stop motion style still suits insects, reptiles and birds mind you.
(
brb man-child cuck corporate supplicant fuck, Sun 27 Sep 2020, 19:43,
Reply)
I disagree - for that particular scene
I think a jerky, grinding, automaton is entirely right.
In the later attack on the boat, it’s the boat that’s the problem rather than Talos.
(
Thrill_My_Chinchilla is old and unimproved, Sun 27 Sep 2020, 21:28,
Reply)
definitely, like rusted joints coming back to life
(
HappyToast Groat froth, Sun 27 Sep 2020, 21:44,
Reply)