
It means someone can be a hypocrite and still right.
( , Wed 21 Dec 2022, 15:03, Reply)

He is capable of being funny, but this particular whiny little bitch routine got very stale, very quickly.
( , Wed 21 Dec 2022, 15:43, Reply)

But shredding £10,000* on social media during the height of a cost of living crisis was never going to go down well with anybody.
*He claims that he didn't actually shred the £10K and the wads of cash he filmed himself shredding were fakes. But it wouldn't surprise me in the slightest if this was more utterly short-sighted backtracking.
( , Wed 21 Dec 2022, 16:07, Reply)

But then I swear the first time I saw Sarah Millican do a routine I thought she was funny. That must have been a dream though.
( , Wed 21 Dec 2022, 16:20, Reply)

Apart from Eddie Izzard, and I'm not certain that he counts.
I also used to think that Joe Lycett was funny, but that's when I was confusing him with his less-smug doppelganger, Joe Cornish.
( , Wed 21 Dec 2022, 16:26, Reply)

( , Wed 21 Dec 2022, 17:03, Reply)

There's an ignore button if you find my contributions overly triggering.
( , Wed 21 Dec 2022, 17:15, Reply)

He did go off the boil after that.
( , Wed 21 Dec 2022, 19:21, Reply)

I say 'contemporary', must be 20+ years old now. Christ.
( , Wed 21 Dec 2022, 19:31, Reply)

( , Wed 21 Dec 2022, 19:49, Reply)

And if they call him out on it he says ".... doesnt mean I'm not right!"
( , Wed 21 Dec 2022, 21:10, Reply)

If he did that, they'd both be right.
Though, to do so, Beckham would have to address Qatar's homophobia directly rather than ignore it for money.
( , Wed 21 Dec 2022, 21:56, Reply)

You can be a hypocrite in your actions without invalidating your ideas.
...and back to square 1.
( , Thu 22 Dec 2022, 9:16, Reply)

Actions are more important, but the original point seemed to be suggesting that being a hypocrite on any level (in this case, 7 years ago) somehow invalidates what someone is saying.
( , Thu 22 Dec 2022, 10:36, Reply)

I feel that the hypocrisy is problematic in this case due to the context of Lycett's 'ultimatum'.
Lycett wasn't saying "Qatar is bad, you shouldn't go there." after being there himself. He was telling Beckham that his standing as a gay icon (?) in the LGTB community would be tarnished by his support of the Qatar World Cup and that his involvement would ultimately prove damaging for the LGBT community.
Basically "If you care at all about LGBT rights, you shouldn't travel to Qatar for personal gain". Despite Lycett being a queer man that has travelled to Qatar for personal gain.
Mind you, I'm not really fussed that he's being a hypocrite. The whole stunt was a "LOOK AT ME LOOK AT ME LOOK AT ME" routine, just like most of the boring cunt's output over the last few months.
It's a bit of a shame, really. I watched him in a Jonathan Ross interview last night and he (mostly) came across as charming and relatively likeable. It's just this low effort slacktivism that turns me off. 'Oh, look. You're a somewhat recognisable, left-leaning TV personality appearing on Sunday with LK pretending to be a right-wing Tory supporter'. Genius
( , Thu 22 Dec 2022, 10:54, Reply)

sold his liberal image (which he has built off the back of things like promotions in gay magazines) to help the government with the "sportswashing" of Qatar, via a ten year ambassadorship deal, not that people shouldn't travel there for any-old work.
( , Thu 22 Dec 2022, 11:23, Reply)