
Regardless, if you're into this kind of stuff then you're a fucking nonce in my book. It's just a lighter version of the lolicon/shotacon filth that mentally ill weebs have been churning out for decades.
( , Wed 22 Feb 2023, 6:09, Reply)

Have paraphilias involving children, compared to percentage of male people who demand to be seen as women?
( , Wed 22 Feb 2023, 9:07, Reply)

they want you to say that people born biologically male, either through some inherent biological urge or societal programming, are more likely to have paraphilias involving children, or they want you to say the opposite.
Either way, it is very likely that whichever viewpoint you have will be criticised and used as an example of your backwards thinking and outdated, bigoted, views.
( , Wed 22 Feb 2023, 12:27, Reply)

( , Wed 22 Feb 2023, 12:39, Reply)

compared to the sick filth I imagine most of you wank to
though as far as I could tell the exhibition was about Labelle comic strip, not her private passions, so it all seems a little judgey
( , Wed 22 Feb 2023, 11:09, Reply)

There doesn't appear to be an overtly sexualised nature to her artwork from what I've managed to find in a relatively brief dive into Google. Certainly, the picture everybody is clutching their pearls over is not sexualised in the slightest (unless I'm completely missing something) and I'm pretty sure she isn't the first illustrator to use a photograph for reference, especially when it comes to getting anatomic proportions correct.
I have absolutely no doubt that the criticism she is receiving has its roots in transphobia. There's no end of Cis folk out there producing far more questionable images without the slightest hint of public flogging.
That being said, if she has produced sexualised lolicon/shotacon style images then she's still a fucking nonce. It matters not a fuck that the subjects are anthropomorphised animals, nor what the artist's gender/sex might be.
Edit:
( , Wed 22 Feb 2023, 11:34, Reply)

given that theres so few of them. Why is clinteastwoodbradfield and all these blokes on twitter getting so vexxed about it?
Fucking grandstanding about "exposing children to a trans nonce fetishist", It's an inner manchester micro brewery hosting an exhibition of a trans comic artist, not centre parcs. No families are wandering in off the street and being corrupted into the evil lifestyle, if they pull a crowd at all, which is a dubious proposition, it's going to be people supportive of trans rights already, and if theres kids they're going to starting at their phones as they do at every other thing in life, not getting nonced.
( , Wed 22 Feb 2023, 12:15, Reply)

a generic "suitable for all" message on the flier has been re-interpreted as a childrens show with balloons and cake.
I'm down with banning kids from all art galleries and pubs if they want a compromise.
( , Wed 22 Feb 2023, 12:44, Reply)

Actually, I'm all for just banning them in general.
Edit: Misinterpreted, indeed!
( , Wed 22 Feb 2023, 13:42, Reply)

"...seems a little judgey". Oh my...
( , Wed 22 Feb 2023, 13:22, Reply)