
( , Thu 20 Apr 2023, 0:39, Reply)

Where there's muck, there's brass.
That being said, it seems a bit unfair to lump all the legitimate artists and designers with such an astronomical tax just to benefit from the AI crowd. There's probably going to be some adjustment to the terms over the next few weeks I reckon.
This whole AI 'revolution' really leaves a bad taste in my mouth.
( , Thu 20 Apr 2023, 6:36, Reply)

"It's just another tool, and it frees me from boring labour so I can devote my time to higher pursuits like concept and style choice." Yes, because a client will still want to pay you for something they can easily do themselves.
( , Thu 20 Apr 2023, 8:09, Reply)

"Well, I generated the base image via AI, but then I touched it up a little in Photoshop which means that the final product is very much my own."
Load of fucking shite, but I suspect we're stuck with it now - especially as the algorithms/NN's continually improve and it becomes more and more difficult to distinguish computer generated output from actual human artistry. Looks like things are very quickly beginning to go that way with Music and Literature, too.
I suppose we could hope that the majority continue to value authenticity over aesthetic. But I reckon we're fucked in that regard as well.
( , Thu 20 Apr 2023, 8:30, Reply)

1. Draw a house freehand.
2. Draw a house using a ruler so your edges are a bit straighter and things line up.
3. Draw a house after constructing a base grid on the page with measurements and vanishing points.
4. Draw a house after blocking out the structure using a 3D package and outputting an image as basically a very advanced base grid, complete with lens curvature and angle of view. But you have still made all the choices and done all the groundwork yourself.
5. Tell a computer to draw you a house, using prompts that you know will get an appropriate output. It will probably ape someone else's style without their permission, and look slightly "off" if you spend any time studying it.
Levels 1 to 4 are art, using varying amounts of assistance to save time and get everything as technically correct as possible. Level 5 is briefing another individual to do the art for you.
( , Thu 20 Apr 2023, 18:22, Reply)

Progress can feel like cheating to those whose status and sense of purpose is rendered obsolete by new technology.
I'm frankly amazed by some AI music I've heard. I'm excited to work with AI music tools, and I'm excited to work with AI visual art tools too, once they become, you know, good. Contextual selection tools would be so useful and time-saving. Typing (or speaking) instructions to perform laborious and repetitive tasks would be wonderful.
I understand the fear surrounding AI, but right now I'm quite optimistic about it all. Without AI this could be a lonely galaxy. If we can't have the Star Trek future at least we can have Battlestar Galactica.
( , Thu 20 Apr 2023, 19:28, Reply)

An argument could certainly be made that a traditional artist's status will eventually be rendered obsolete by AI, but only because the vast majority of consumers are looking at the final product and give not a shit about the process involved.
The same goes for AI music. The tracks that I've heard have been astonishingly authentic (although, considering that contemporary pop and rap are already based largely upon algorithms and largely written/produced by third parties, it's not that much of a leap).
Either way, I wouldn't really regard it as progress. Especially if the value of human art is subsequently depreciated.
( , Fri 21 Apr 2023, 7:16, Reply)

but this will certainly improve. AI will eventually be able to emulate the creative process without having to rely on human input for good ideas .
There might be a backlash against AI generated art, with people using authenticated human body fluids to paint on cave walls.
( , Fri 21 Apr 2023, 11:54, Reply)

showing you their thought processes in designing a simple game graphic. Stage one looked okay (a point where many people would think it was finished - the sort of thing AI can generate), but then they tidied it up and stylised it so by the end it was undeniably a far superior image.
I wish I could find that post, because AI art always seems to be at the "it looks about right" stage, when the real depth of knowledge seems to come after that. The article really made you focus on the subtleties of such work.
Whilst AI art tools are impressive/scary, it does seem another massive leap for it to understand creativity in any way. By design, it feels like it will always head toward the average, when interesting art needs something unique.
( , Fri 21 Apr 2023, 12:49, Reply)

I wonder if growing up in an age where most imagery has been generated by AI will further blind people to the flaws of AI art, not unlike the way many have become deaf to the lifelessness of autotuned vocals in pop
( , Fri 21 Apr 2023, 21:15, Reply)

like a mimic in nature only has to look close enough to the real thing from the perspective of its prey. I think it could do this within a decade, and without achieving/suffering consciousness. Plants can mimic.
( , Sat 22 Apr 2023, 0:17, Reply)

And when it comes to matters of life and death, evolution seems to favour erring on the side of caution.
My point was about the effect of exposure on aesthetic preferences
( , Sat 22 Apr 2023, 5:47, Reply)

and how they use things like cgi or autotune, then you can see both interesting use, practical use, and lazy use. The good stuff is still there.
Unfortunately the lazy use seems the most popular with the public, though.
( , Sat 22 Apr 2023, 9:14, Reply)

See also the history of tea, cotton/clothing, the food industry, etc.
IMO an artificial intelligence producing art does nothing to devalue art produced by a biological intelligence, and vice versa. The widespread availability of previously archaic elite knowledge doesn't devalue the product of that knowledge to me. It may diminish the value of the previously privileged elite's skill set in an economic sense, but that will hopefully matter less and less as we head towards post-capitalist Utopia.
( , Fri 21 Apr 2023, 19:59, Reply)


( , Fri 21 Apr 2023, 21:43, Reply)

There's an awful lot of human art sold for 99p or less.
( , Sat 22 Apr 2023, 0:11, Reply)

Most people can't do that very well, and just copy existing work.
However, 99% of work that pays the bills is copying and grunt work, which it does seem very good at.
( , Thu 20 Apr 2023, 9:01, Reply)

Maybe everybody's next job could be fixing the machines that made them redundant. An exciting future awaits!
( , Thu 20 Apr 2023, 21:01, Reply)

“Yay, I can get AI to do my grunt work!”; it means that whoever needs the grunt work done will say “Yay, now I don’t have to piss about with expensive illustrators to get grunt work done”.
Not only that, but the person that uses the AI instead of hiring you won’t be saying “phew, I’m glad I’ve found a programme to create images for me” - instead that person will be saying “wow, I’m very good at art. Why did I ever bother paying illustrators and designers when I’m actually great at it, now I have this tool!”
( , Fri 21 Apr 2023, 11:24, Reply)

but my point about grunt work was that it is a bad thing for creatives who need the boring work to fund the good work, and it will steal that work, not provide any good work. However, Photoshop has been doing that for years with each new feature it adds.
It's the smaller "time-saving" tools rather than the type-in-a-prompt-and-I'll-do-everything tools that seem the bigger problem in that regard.
Regarding “wow, I’m very good at art. Why did I ever bother paying illustrators and designers when I’m actually great at it, now I have this tool!” - there is a point where AI art just looks like placeholder shit, and it's likely going to be easier for a designer to start from scratch than try and salvage something, should they want the artwork to look professional.
I see it as the same as Wix is to web development. It gets you to a certain point, but without acquiring any skills along the way. The best you can hope for is mediocrity if you don't understand any of the details.
( , Fri 21 Apr 2023, 12:28, Reply)