I'm no Trump supporter,
but to be honest, he's the only president in decades who didn't start a new war.
( , Sat 1 Jun 2024, 19:20, Reply)
but to be honest, he's the only president in decades who didn't start a new war.
( , Sat 1 Jun 2024, 19:20, Reply)
Not for lack of trying.
He increased extrajudicial drones strike executions, assassinated the head of the Iranian Quds, and nearly started a nuclear war in Korea. He also wants to quit NATO and is no friend of Ukraine.
( , Sat 1 Jun 2024, 19:52, Reply)
He increased extrajudicial drones strike executions, assassinated the head of the Iranian Quds, and nearly started a nuclear war in Korea. He also wants to quit NATO and is no friend of Ukraine.
( , Sat 1 Jun 2024, 19:52, Reply)
So what you're saying is
That he's the only President in decades who didn't start any new wars.
( , Sat 1 Jun 2024, 20:06, Reply)
That he's the only President in decades who didn't start any new wars.
( , Sat 1 Jun 2024, 20:06, Reply)
So what you're saying is it's fine to kill more people than Obama, disrupt NATO, provoke North Korea and Iran, and encourage Putin to invade Ukraine,
as long as you make no formal declarations of war.
( , Sat 1 Jun 2024, 20:22, Reply)
as long as you make no formal declarations of war.
( , Sat 1 Jun 2024, 20:22, Reply)
I think you're confused
The only formal declaration of war, involving the United States since WW2, was against Panama in 1989. What you were saying is that Trump is the only President in decades not to start a new war.
( , Sat 1 Jun 2024, 20:31, Reply)
The only formal declaration of war, involving the United States since WW2, was against Panama in 1989. What you were saying is that Trump is the only President in decades not to start a new war.
( , Sat 1 Jun 2024, 20:31, Reply)
Also
The issue that you were upset with was that Trump was the only President in decades that didn't start a new war. Can we get back to that or are you just tacitly agreeing.
( , Sat 1 Jun 2024, 21:48, Reply)
The issue that you were upset with was that Trump was the only President in decades that didn't start a new war. Can we get back to that or are you just tacitly agreeing.
( , Sat 1 Jun 2024, 21:48, Reply)
You seem confused
"So what you're saying is it's fine to kill more people than Obama, disrupt NATO, provoke North Korea and Iran, and encourage Putin to invade Ukraine,
as long as you make no formal declarations of war."
This is not a true statement. You use lies and don't try to substantiate them.
You don't defend your mistakes, just make new ones. Oh and call me names. Is that all you have?
( , Sun 2 Jun 2024, 0:02, Reply)
"So what you're saying is it's fine to kill more people than Obama, disrupt NATO, provoke North Korea and Iran, and encourage Putin to invade Ukraine,
as long as you make no formal declarations of war."
This is not a true statement. You use lies and don't try to substantiate them.
You don't defend your mistakes, just make new ones. Oh and call me names. Is that all you have?
( , Sun 2 Jun 2024, 0:02, Reply)
...And now you've started thread deleting like sockcooker.
Literally no point interacting with you any further.
( , Sun 2 Jun 2024, 0:21, Reply)
Literally no point interacting with you any further.
( , Sun 2 Jun 2024, 0:21, Reply)
Donald Trump is the only US president not to start a new war in the last few decades. Please affirm or deny.
( , Sun 2 Jun 2024, 0:22, Reply)
Well, the Falklands was a "conflict"
Who knows what Vietnam was. But in the US congress needs to declare war. Probably an act in the UK.
( , Sun 2 Jun 2024, 0:26, Reply)
Who knows what Vietnam was. But in the US congress needs to declare war. Probably an act in the UK.
( , Sun 2 Jun 2024, 0:26, Reply)
by cozying up to Poots and Kimmy and not starting a war becuse it financially suited him. Is that what you mean?
( , Sat 1 Jun 2024, 21:09, Reply)
( , Sat 1 Jun 2024, 21:09, Reply)
No
I was trying to understand why Trump was the only President not to start a new war in decades, was a problem.
I don't think he did, do you?
( , Sat 1 Jun 2024, 21:15, Reply)
I was trying to understand why Trump was the only President not to start a new war in decades, was a problem.
I don't think he did, do you?
( , Sat 1 Jun 2024, 21:15, Reply)
Hmm, maybe it's becuase he doesn't understand most things political.
( , Sat 1 Jun 2024, 21:34, Reply)
( , Sat 1 Jun 2024, 21:34, Reply)
Perhaps appeasing authoritarian leaders works in the short term.
Maybe said authoritarian leaders were happy to be acknowledged and given opportunities to infiltrate Western politics.
( , Sat 1 Jun 2024, 22:57, Reply)
Maybe said authoritarian leaders were happy to be acknowledged and given opportunities to infiltrate Western politics.
( , Sat 1 Jun 2024, 22:57, Reply)
You mean
like the Trump Dossier and the Hunter Biden Laptop. They are both Russian infiltration.
( , Sun 2 Jun 2024, 0:29, Reply)
like the Trump Dossier and the Hunter Biden Laptop. They are both Russian infiltration.
( , Sun 2 Jun 2024, 0:29, Reply)
not counting "civil"
but I cant think of any that Clinton or Obama started, unless you're getting illuminati about it.
( , Sun 2 Jun 2024, 1:15, Reply)
but I cant think of any that Clinton or Obama started, unless you're getting illuminati about it.
( , Sun 2 Jun 2024, 1:15, Reply)
you made the claim, I'm sure you'll be able to list one that either clinton and obama started, being the thoughtful bloke you are
there was some nato bombing in yugoslavia under clinton, but the serbs were already kicking the shit out the kosovans. Obama came to power with afghanistan and iraq already in full swing and there was mostly drawdown in his terms. Likewise obama did bomb libya, but there was a civil war already going on there. Neither of these limited interventions would be described as wars in themselves.
I could google, but as I was alive during these events I'll just have to rely on knowing stuff. But I am curious
( , Sun 2 Jun 2024, 7:14, Reply)
there was some nato bombing in yugoslavia under clinton, but the serbs were already kicking the shit out the kosovans. Obama came to power with afghanistan and iraq already in full swing and there was mostly drawdown in his terms. Likewise obama did bomb libya, but there was a civil war already going on there. Neither of these limited interventions would be described as wars in themselves.
I could google, but as I was alive during these events I'll just have to rely on knowing stuff. But I am curious
( , Sun 2 Jun 2024, 7:14, Reply)
This echoes my thoughts on the matter
I mean, the words "start a new war." do have a pretty well-defined meaning that I don't think apply to most presidents in the last few decades. I can think of Vietnam, Korea, Afghanistan, Afghanistan/Iraq.
There may be others, but they escape me for the moment.
( , Sun 2 Jun 2024, 14:00, Reply)
I mean, the words "start a new war." do have a pretty well-defined meaning that I don't think apply to most presidents in the last few decades. I can think of Vietnam, Korea, Afghanistan, Afghanistan/Iraq.
There may be others, but they escape me for the moment.
( , Sun 2 Jun 2024, 14:00, Reply)
and Trump wasn't exactly a dove
he bombed syria, had that tit for tat with iran where he drone striked that general.
Still, he did seem to get on well with Putin. He lifted sanctions against vlad until it was blocked by congress, back when there was still a few in his party that would stand up to him. He must have said sorry for annexing crimea and promised his buddy donny he wouldn't do it again. "I iz nice guy, da. Trust me"
( , Sun 2 Jun 2024, 14:54, Reply)
he bombed syria, had that tit for tat with iran where he drone striked that general.
Still, he did seem to get on well with Putin. He lifted sanctions against vlad until it was blocked by congress, back when there was still a few in his party that would stand up to him. He must have said sorry for annexing crimea and promised his buddy donny he wouldn't do it again. "I iz nice guy, da. Trust me"
( , Sun 2 Jun 2024, 14:54, Reply)